Feeds

SirCam due to wipe Windows PCs next Tuesday

But payload looks buggy

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

SirCam, the bandwidth-munching privacy invading mass mailing virus, is due to attempt to wipe infected users' Windows PCs next Tuesday.

That's the bad news. The good news is that indications are the malicious payload the virus contains isn't particularly effective, probably because of shoddy programming on the virus writer's part.

Graham Cluley, senior technology consultant at Sophos, said that the virus is programmed so that there's a one in 50 chance that on any day the virus would fill up an infected user's hard disc with rubbish. There's been very few reports of this ever happening, suggesting the virus is "buggy" or sensitive to user's set-ups, he told us.

Because of this the one in 20 "possibility", at least according to how the virus is programmed, that SirCam might wipe a victim's PC on October 16 is probably not going to be realised.

That said it still makes sense for people to get themselves disinfected, especially since the virus is still common three months after it appeared on the Internet in mid-July.

MessageLabs, a managed services firm that scans its users email for viruses, has blocked 2,967 copies of SirCam in the last 24 hours and a 414,000 copies of the virus in all.

As previously reported, SirCam normally arrives in an email with a random subject, body text and attachment name. Infected attachments contain a double extension, which gives users a clue that an email might contain a virus.

The subject line of an email is the name of a file found on the sending PC. The attachment will carry the name of this document file, with a second extension such as COM, EXE, PIF, LNK. The worm contains its own SMTP routine, which is used to send email messages to email addresses found in the Windows address book and the temporary internet folder.

A document file is included in the executable that the worm mails, which means there is a possibility of confidential or embarrassing material being mailed out. If the document is large - so is the infected attachment, and that means some copies of SirCam can weigh in at 10MB and above. ®

External Links

Write up on Sircam by Sophos

Related Stories

Thousands of idiots still infected by SirCam
SirCam virus hogs connections with spam
Users haven't learned any lessons from the Love Bug
Rise in viruses within emails outpacing growth of email
Internet will become 'unusable' by 2008
SirCam tops Virus charts

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Who.is does the Harlem Shake
Blame it on LOLing XSS terroristas
Researchers tell black hats: 'YOU'RE SOOO PREDICTABLE'
Want to register that domain? We're way ahead of you.
Stunned by Shellshock Bash bug? Patch all you can – or be punished
UK data watchdog rolls up its sleeves, polishes truncheon
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
SHELLSHOCKED: Fortune 1000 outfits Bash out batches of patches
CloudPassage points to 'pervasive' threat of Bash bug
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.