Data Centre


Oracle trying hard to make sure Pentagon knows Amazon ain't the only cloud around

Big Red files additional protest over JEDI contract

By Rebecca Hill


The Pentagon is no longer taking questions on its controversial cloud contract after making last-minute amendments to the deal – and has received another complaint from disgruntled prospective bidder Oracle.

The Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure (JEDI) contract has a massive scope, covering different levels of secrecy and classification across all branches of the US military, and a massive budget, being worth a potential $10bn for a maximum of 10 years.

Unsurprisingly, it has garnered similar levels of interest and complaint. Most criticism focused on the decision to hand the deal to a single vendor amid speculation that AWS would be a shoo-in.

Would-be bidder – and longtime AWS rival – Oracle filed an official complaint with US government at the start of the month, arguing a single vendor would lock the Department of Defense into "legacy cloud" and went against its purported commitment to innovation and competition.

It has now filed a supplementary protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) – a move first reported by US outlet Nextgov, and which is not yet public but is likely to be an exchange of information and documents.

The filing coincided with the Pentagon updating the terms of the JEDI deal, which it said came after engagement with industry after the previous request for proposals (RFP) was published.

It received 218 questions to that RFP, which included one about whether a request for an online commercial marketplace for third-party products and services was "intended to limit the competition to Amazon".

The government responded that many commercial cloud providers have an online marketplace and that it was an important requirement "to facilitate the rapid adoption of cloud infrastructure and the ability to operationalize that infrastructure".

Multiple others related to clarifications and refinements of the text, for instance on requirements for connectivity in Africa, data storage, purging or destroying hardware, and on pricing scenarios.

The Pentagon this week stopped taking questions on the amendments so it is expected that the final, final RFP – should there be any further changes – will not be far away.

It also published Oracle's initial protest documents, but the department added that it wasn't changing the bidding process. "All offerors are advised that DoD is proceeding with the solicitation process," it said.

According to the GAO's site, it has until 14 November to respond to the first protest case, and until 3 December for the additional filing.

However, the closing date for the JEDI contract remains 17 September. ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily


More from The Register

Oracle gets busy with Lazy FPU fix, adds more CPU Spectre-protectors

Oracle Linux and VM get their innoculations

Hands up who isn't fighting Oracle in court? HPE, for now, as Solaris support sueball tossed

Judge dismisses Big Red's 2016 copyright claim

Oracle's claims of secret deal is a bid to 'distract' from pay bias case, says US Department of Labor

Big Red is red, underpaid staffers are blue. No angry counter-claims can stop that being true

Now, hold on. This may shock you... Oracle allegedly juices its cloud sales with threats and shoddy on-prem support

Board of directors sued for 'failing to protect investors'

Billionaire Buffet's Berkshire liquidates $2.1bn stake in Oracle – months after buying the shares

Bill Gates' bridge chum's firm buys Red Hat stock

Oracle accuses US of underhand tactics because discrimination case 'doomed to fail'

Big Red claims Labor Dept has 'secret pact' with private plaintiff's lawyers

Oracle Database 18: Now in downloadable Linux flavour

Oh, and Windows, but cool kids don't use that

Pentagon cloud contract sueball: Oh no, Oracle doesn't need those docs, AWS tells court

Urges it to chuck Big Red's request to depose former Pentagon staffers, too

New Zealand health boards write down losses on Oracle implementation

End-of-year reports show impairment costs running into millions

Oracle throws toys out pram again, tells US claims court: Competing for Pentagon cloud contract isn't fair!

Address gate criteria, conflicts of interest – then we can play