Software

Oracle's new Java SE subs: Code and support for $25/processor/month

Prepare for audit after inevitable change, says Oracle licensing consultant


Poll Oracle’s put a price on Java SE and support: $25 per physical processor per month, and $2.50 per user per month on the desktop, or less if you buy lots for a long time.

Big Red’s called this a Java SE Subscription and pitched it as “a commonly used model, popular with Linux distributions”. The company also reckons the new deal is better than a perpetual licence, because they involve “an up-front cost plus additional annual support and maintenance fees.”

Oracle’s subs include “license, updates, upgrades, and support in a single price.” Perhaps with some steak knives, too, if you’re among the first 100 callers!

If you like your current Java licences, Oracle will let you keep them. And if Java’s essential for other Oracle products you run, those product already include licences.

The key value of the subs therefore appears to be Oracle’s pledge of “long-term support and tools on the current and on a number of older versions”.

There’s also a little bit of stick to go with the carrot, because come January 2019 Java SE 8 on the desktop won’t be updated any more … unless you buy a sub.

Peter Jansen of Oracle licensing consultancy Navicle told The Register Oracle has made an exception for general purpose use of Java, but that the definition of such use means almost nobody other than code tinkerers will be able to get Java for free. He also said he's seen Oracle switch its auditing emphasis away from Oracle on VMware towards Java licences. As a result plenty of his clients have been told they'll have to start paying for Java.

He is not, however, surprised by the change.

"I think realistically we always kind of expected Oracle would change licensing for Java," he said.

Oracle’s also updated its support roadmap, revealing that Java SE 11 is due in September 2018 and version 12 in March 2019, both with Oracle’s most attentive support well into the future.

Oracle’s previously signalled it had Java licence changes up its sleeve, so this announcement isn’t a complete surprise. We’re less sure if it is welcome: tell us if it is in the poll below. ®

AMP pages do not support showing a poll. See the non-AMP story instead.

Send us news
55 Comments

Oracle scores big win with Fujitsu Japan for its Alloy partner cloud

But Big Red's $8 billion investment plan may not be all it seems

Oracle changes its tune with HQ move to Music City

Nashville 'ticked all the boxes' for Big Red's employees, says founder Ellison

Mega city council's Oracle ERP system still not legally safe, compliant... 2 years after rollout

Fusion software misses another deadline, one external auditors for Birmingham City Council described as 'absolutely crucial'

Palantir and Oracle buddy up on cloud infrastructure

But do all Foundry workloads move to OCI? It's up to the customer, spy-tech firm says

Catch Java 22, available from Oracle for a limited time

Latest release of coffee-themed programming language aspires to simplicity with a dozen new features

Oracle adds GenAI to Fusion with a whopping 50 use cases

But is there one that can sort out failing ERP projects? Well Larry, is there?

Oracle AI buzz means Larry Ellison's worth $15B more today

And here you were saying tech hadn't yet made a difference to someone special

Oracle investors hear the magic word 'Nvidia' and boom! Buy, buy, buy

Forget the piffle about real world results, let's look at the potential of wundertech

How to Netflix Oracle’s blockbuster audit model

Terms and conditions apply. Lawyers need not

'We had to educate Oracle about our contract,' CIO says after Big Red audit

Estimates put audits at $3B revenue for Ellison's company, so go at your own pace, experts recommend

Google advances with vector search in MySQL, leapfrogging Oracle in LLM support

Meanwhile, only 22% of orgs are looking at GenAI strategy for databases

City council megaproject to spend millions for manual work Oracle system was meant to do

Train-wreck public sector project was forecast to save 'bankrupt' council money