Info Commissioner tears into Google's 'call us journalists' trial defence

No wriggling out of regulation, snarls ICO chief

By Gareth Corfield


RTBF Trial UK Information Commissioner Elizabeth Denham has declared war on Google, urging the High Court to throw out the ad biz's defences in the Right To Be Forgotten trial because they are "impermissibly broad".

"If Google were right in its approach to the concept of 'journalism', that would yield a result whereby the commissioner would in practice be stripped of any effective regulatory powers in respect of Google's search operations," thundered Denham, whose written submission to the court was prepared by barristers Anya Proops QC and Rupert Paines.

The ongoing Right To Be Forgotten trial features two people, referred to publicly as NT1 and NT2, who have made a legal first by taking Google to court in London over their data protection rights. The Information Commissioner was granted permission to intervene in NT1's case by trial judge Mr Justice Warby.

Denham's submissions were adopted by NT1's barrister, Hugh Tomlinson QC, who explicitly referred to them in his closing speech to the court yesterday, saying:

"We do say this is not journalism, not within the journalistic exemption. The submissions are made in paragraph 26 of the ICO's submissions."

Does Parliament or Google decide when your criminal past is forgotten?


Among other things, Google claims that its search results ought to benefit from the journalism exemption to EU data protection laws. Though its barrister, Antony White QC, acknowledged that the EU court decision that created the right to be forgotten explicitly said that journalism "does not appear to be... [what data] processing carried out by the operator of a search engine" falls under, in legal terms White argued that that court did not rule it out completely.

This argument enraged the ICO, which said in the submission: "The concept of 'journalism' presupposes a process by which content is published to an audience pursuant to the taking of human editorial decisions as to the substantive nature and extent of that content."

In plain English, humans (mostly) don't decide what appears in search results so calling Google's activities "journalism" is just plain wrong, according to the commissioner.

"In effect," she continued, if the High Court accepted Google's argument and let it be protected by the journalism exemption, the ad-supported firm "would be able to operate the right to be forgotten regime almost entirely free from regulatory oversight and control".

Denham has also set out her stall against social media companies, telling Parliament during a hearing yesterday that "nobody is making the argument any more that these are benign platforms". ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily


More from The Register

Google Play Store spews malware onto 9 million 'Droids

How did these get through the net?

FYI: Drone maker DJI's 'Get it on Google Play' website button definitely does not get the app from Google Play...

Updated Quadcopter slinger rudely palms folk off to .apk download

Latest Google+ flaw leads Chocolate Factory to shut down site early

52.5 million accounts at risk, tens of people are worried

Here you go, cloudy admins: Google emits NATty odds 'n' sods

Google Cloud Next Incremental titbits aimed at time-poor techies

Google's secret to a healthy phone? Remote-controlling your apps

Look Ma, no not much malware!

Thanksgiving brings together Apple's Siri and Google Assistant

A divided tech nation embraces, uncomfortably

Google-whisperers beat reCaptcha voice challenge with 90% success rate

Code's up on Github and Google's fine with that

Comparison sites cry foul over Google Shopping service

Original complainants say pay-to-play remedy has left them in the cold

Google: I don't know why you say Allo, I say goodbye

Sidelined messaging app given end-of-life date of March 2019

Surprising no one, Google to appeal against European Commission's €4.34bn Android fine

We'll just take our time here