Software

Due to Oracle being Oracle, Eclipse holds poll to rename Java EE (No, it won't be Java McJava Face)

Nor C-- or Should Have Used Go or Screw Ellison...

By Thomas Claburn in San Francisco

144 SHARE

Unable to convince Oracle to allow the use of its trademarked term "Java" to refer to the open source version of Java Enterprise Edition (Java EE), the Eclipse Foundation is asking those who care about such things to vote on proposed names for the software project.

Last summer, Oracle said it had begun working with the Eclipse Foundation and the Java EE community to transfer its Java EE code and governance responsibilities to the foundation.

But Oracle is not giving up its intellectual property rights in the name "Java." And so for the past few months, the Java EE community has been puzzling over how to refer to the open source version of Java EE.

The Eclipse Foundation is using "Eclipse Enterprise for Java" or "EE4J" as the umbrella term for the open source project, but because EE4J covers more than just the Java EE code, there remains a need for a brand name.

"Much like the OpenJDK project implements the Java SE Platform specification, the EE4J projects will provide implementations of a set of specifications that we today call Java EE: We need a brand name for this set of specifications," explained Eclipse Foundation director of open source projects Wayne Beaton, in a GitHub post in November that began the solicitation for potential names.

In January, Java EE Guardians, a user group populated by a number of Java experts including Java creator James Gosling, published an open letter to Oracle pleading to be allowed to use "Java EE."

"On behalf of the community, the Java EE Guardians ask that Oracle and other EE4J stakeholders work together to allow the new platform to retain the Java EE name, the 'javax.enterprise' package for new technologies and existing 'javax' packages for existing technologies," the letter, posted by Reza Rahman, a Java consultant and former Oracle Java EE evangelist, stated.

Oracle's reply, through Will Lyons, senior director of product management for WebLogic, amounted to: we appreciate your input, but no, we want you to pick a new name.

This is not merely a matter of perception: if javax (Java extension) package names have to be changed, that raises potential code compatibility issues.

Lyons, however, attempted to allay this concern by noting that Oracle intends "to allow certain uses of existing javax packages as those packages evolve for compatibility."

Beaton ensured the naming process would not be much fun. Suggested names, he said, could not include Oracle's trademarked "Java" or Eclipse Foundation trademarks, and could not be obscene, sexist, racist, controversial, or frivolous.

"We’re not going to choose Boaty McBoatface or the like," he said.

Nominations concluded November 30, 2017 and this week the Eclipse Foundation narrowed the field of contenders down to just two.

"The EE4J [Project Management Committee] considered numerous factors, but in the end the selection process effectively boiled down to identifying those names from the suggestions that The Eclipse Foundation can register and hold as a trademark on behalf of the community," said Beaton on Wednesday, in a follow-up GitHub post.

Java EE's new name will be either "Jakarta EE" – geographically related to the Indonesian island of Java – or "Enterprise Profile" – the textual equivalent of Ambien.

Voting closes February 23, 2018. Choose your poison.

Had anyone asked us, we'd have suggested !@#$ Larry EE. But nobody did. ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily

144 Comments

More from The Register

Oracle gets busy with Lazy FPU fix, adds more CPU Spectre-protectors

Oracle Linux and VM get their innoculations

Oracle Database 18: Now in downloadable Linux flavour

Oh, and Windows, but cool kids don't use that

New Zealand health boards write down losses on Oracle implementation

End-of-year reports show impairment costs running into millions

Oracle's in-house lawyer denied access to Uncle Sam's procurement docs in JEDI legal battle

You can’t stop the change: Chalk one up to AWS as judge agrees with Big Red's rival

Oracle: Run, don't walk, to patch this critical Database takeover bug

Flaw in House Larry's flagship product allows 'complete compromise' of servers

What now, Larry? AWS boss insists Amazon will have dumped Oracle database by end of 2019

re:Invent Clock's ticking on Ellison's smack talk

Fed up with Oracle's Sith, AWS wades into Big Red's lawsuit over Pentagon JEDI contract

Long-standing cloud enemies to do battle in the courts

Old bugs, new bugs, red bugs … yes, it's Oracle mega-update day again

Out of 284 flaws, 33 are rated critical. Big Red admins have big patches ahead

Oracle snaffles up a chunk of SD-WAN market with Talari Networks buyout

As shareholders sign off on Big Red's big pay packet for first time in seven years

Detroit sh*t shifter's operating costs waste away with Oracle's cloud

Sewerage department pinches off big brown puff for Big Red