Software

Due to Oracle being Oracle, Eclipse holds poll to rename Java EE (No, it won't be Java McJava Face)

Nor C-- or Should Have Used Go or Screw Ellison...

By Thomas Claburn in San Francisco

144 SHARE

Unable to convince Oracle to allow the use of its trademarked term "Java" to refer to the open source version of Java Enterprise Edition (Java EE), the Eclipse Foundation is asking those who care about such things to vote on proposed names for the software project.

Last summer, Oracle said it had begun working with the Eclipse Foundation and the Java EE community to transfer its Java EE code and governance responsibilities to the foundation.

But Oracle is not giving up its intellectual property rights in the name "Java." And so for the past few months, the Java EE community has been puzzling over how to refer to the open source version of Java EE.

The Eclipse Foundation is using "Eclipse Enterprise for Java" or "EE4J" as the umbrella term for the open source project, but because EE4J covers more than just the Java EE code, there remains a need for a brand name.

"Much like the OpenJDK project implements the Java SE Platform specification, the EE4J projects will provide implementations of a set of specifications that we today call Java EE: We need a brand name for this set of specifications," explained Eclipse Foundation director of open source projects Wayne Beaton, in a GitHub post in November that began the solicitation for potential names.

In January, Java EE Guardians, a user group populated by a number of Java experts including Java creator James Gosling, published an open letter to Oracle pleading to be allowed to use "Java EE."

"On behalf of the community, the Java EE Guardians ask that Oracle and other EE4J stakeholders work together to allow the new platform to retain the Java EE name, the 'javax.enterprise' package for new technologies and existing 'javax' packages for existing technologies," the letter, posted by Reza Rahman, a Java consultant and former Oracle Java EE evangelist, stated.

Oracle's reply, through Will Lyons, senior director of product management for WebLogic, amounted to: we appreciate your input, but no, we want you to pick a new name.

This is not merely a matter of perception: if javax (Java extension) package names have to be changed, that raises potential code compatibility issues.

Lyons, however, attempted to allay this concern by noting that Oracle intends "to allow certain uses of existing javax packages as those packages evolve for compatibility."

Beaton ensured the naming process would not be much fun. Suggested names, he said, could not include Oracle's trademarked "Java" or Eclipse Foundation trademarks, and could not be obscene, sexist, racist, controversial, or frivolous.

"We’re not going to choose Boaty McBoatface or the like," he said.

Nominations concluded November 30, 2017 and this week the Eclipse Foundation narrowed the field of contenders down to just two.

"The EE4J [Project Management Committee] considered numerous factors, but in the end the selection process effectively boiled down to identifying those names from the suggestions that The Eclipse Foundation can register and hold as a trademark on behalf of the community," said Beaton on Wednesday, in a follow-up GitHub post.

Java EE's new name will be either "Jakarta EE" – geographically related to the Indonesian island of Java – or "Enterprise Profile" – the textual equivalent of Ambien.

Voting closes February 23, 2018. Choose your poison.

Had anyone asked us, we'd have suggested !@#$ Larry EE. But nobody did. ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily

144 Comments

More from The Register

Oracle gets busy with Lazy FPU fix, adds more CPU Spectre-protectors

Oracle Linux and VM get their innoculations

Oracle cuts ribbon on distributed ledger service

Big Red brags bank backing for blockchain biz

Umm, Oracle – about that patch? It might not be very sticky ...

Security researcher says WebLogic fix can be bypassed, posts proof-of-concept

CIOs planning to snub Oracle for other cloudy vendors – analyst

Drop for Big Red shares as biz prepares to announce Q4 financial results

Oracle tells court: Boss man Mark Hurd didn't have docs relevant to HPE spat over Solaris

If he did, HPE has to prove he deliberately deleted them

Oracle launches its very own 'net threat map

Pew! Pew! The whole world is connected, and the Internet is super-dangerous

Oracle's new Java SE subs: Code and support for $25/processor/month

Poll Prepare for audit after inevitable change, says Oracle licensing consultant

Oracle wants to improve Linux load balancing and failover

Native to ordinary interfaces, Big Red reckons bonded channels are needed for RDMA

Terix boss thrown in the cooler for TWO years for peddling pirated Oracle firmware, code patches

Big Red all smiles after black-market support biz bosses jailed

Platinum partner had 'affair' with my wife – then Oracle screwed me, ex-sales boss claims

Regional director takes giant to court in discrimination row