Larry's steely grip on Oracle led to 'conflicts of interest' in NetSuite buy-out, court told

Big Red's lawyers say $9.3bn deal was 'playbook' acquisition

By Rebecca Hill

Posted in Policy, 26th January 2018 13:41 GMT

Oracle's acquisition of NetSuite was a "stage-managed" process rife with conflict of interest, lawyers for one of Big Red's shareholders have argued in a case alleging the biz overpaid for the cloudy ERP firm.

NetSuite was snapped up by Oracle in 2016 for $9.3bn, which equated to $109 per share – about 60 per cent more than the $67.36 share price before the deal was revealed.

One of Oracle's shareholders is claiming that this was a deliberate overpayment to benefit Big Red founder and CTO Larry Ellison, who also had a 40 per cent stake in NetSuite at the time.

The Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority (SEPTA) filed a derivative suit in Delaware Chancery Court against Ellison in May last year, some six months after the deal was approved.

The suit also names co-CEO Safra Catz and the three directors on the special committee that signed off on the merger.

SEPTA claimed that Ellison was able to exercise too much control over the deal – which it alleges earned Larry and his family some $4.1bn – because of his position of power at Oracle.

In oral arguments in the case yesterday, Joel Friedlander, acting for the shareholders, said Ellison was known for controlling the business with an iron fist and suggested board members were unable to say no to the deal.

According to Law360, Friedlander told Delaware vice chancellor Sam Glassock III that the deal followed a "contrived" exploration of NetSuite's interest and "stage-managed" acquisition process.

He argued that, despite moving from Oracle chief exec to CTO, "as a practical matter, his [Ellison's] influence is undiminished". Friedlander also suggested that Ellison's notoriously "controlled mindset" in running his business might explain why the committee members endorsed the deal.

In SEPTA's original filing, the investor said that the three committee members and Catz were conflicted due to years of personal and workplace relationships with Ellison.

"As the directors know, if they fail to approve Ellison's proposals... they will be removed from their lucrative positions," the complaint said.

However, Oracle's lawyers yesterday looked to dismiss the suit. Peter Wald of Latham & Watkins LLP said the deal was a "playbook" acquisition and that the use of an independent special committee shielded it from conflicts of interest.

"All of the evidence in the record is that this was as sterilized as it can get, and you don't see anything from the other side but a conspiracy theory," Wald is quoted as saying.

"The board's approach to this transaction is exactly what the courts have encouraged and should continue to encourage. It follows this court's playbook to a T, to ensure arm's-length bargaining."

The premise of the case – that the deal benefitted Ellison to the cost of Oracle's shareholders – also runs against concerns at the time of the deal that it was selling NetSuite short.

Indeed, when the acquisition was proposed, T Rowe Price Associates, the single largest unaffiliated shareholder of NetSuite, pushed back against it.

It claimed that Ellison's involvement would have put off other potential investors, and meant NetSuite's board had failed to consider other options.

Vice chancellor Glasscock is taking the arguments made in the case brought by SEPTA under consideration. ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily

4 Comments

More from The Register

Terix boss thrown in the cooler for TWO years for peddling pirated Oracle firmware, code patches

Big Red all smiles after black-market support biz bosses jailed

Due to Oracle being Oracle, Eclipse holds poll to rename Java EE (No, it won't be Java McJava Face)

Nor C-- or Should Have Used Go or Screw Ellison...

And Oracle E-biz suite makes 3: Package also vulnerable to exploit used by cryptocurrency miner

Hat trick!

Oracle point-of-sale system vulnerabilities get Big Red cross

Patched, Oracle? Speedily

Oracle open-sources DTrace under the GPL

Which makes lots of sysadmins' fave tracing tool cool for Linux

'Extreme, unnecessary, overheated': US judge slams Oracle salvo in HPE Solaris squabble

Big, red and very, very angry

Rimini Street attempts to claw back more cash in Oracle copyright dispute

Support biz files court petition to recover additional $32m

Oracle slurps bot-wrangling security minnow Zenedge

Buy price not revealed

Oracle sued over claims of shoddy service, licensing designed to force adoption of its kit

A&E Adventures sues Oracle America for breach of contract over point-of-sale shenanigans

10/10 would patch again: Big Red plasters 'easily exploitable' backdoor in Oracle Identity Manager

Remote unauthenticated attack bug gets perfect CVSS score