Funnily enough, small-town broadband cheaper than big cable packages, say Harvard eggheads

Why can't we have this in more places? Oh, right, lobbyists

By Shaun Nichols in San Francisco

Posted in Personal Tech, 12th January 2018 01:54 GMT

A study in the US has found that, where they're still allowed, municipally-owned broadband networks are likely to deliver customers a better value than what the cable giants offer.

The research (PDF), conducted by Harvard University's Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society, found that over a four-year period, homes that were connected to a community-owned broadband network frequently spent less on their service than those connected to a private commercial carrier like Comcast.

The brainiacs behind the study, published this week, said they looked at 27 community-owned muni networks – both cable and DSL that offered at least 25Mbps down and 3Mbps up – in the America, and found that all but four were able to give customers a lower price than their commercial telco competition.

Muni broadband networks were also clearer in their pricing models, meaning subscribers weren't subject to "sticker shock" due to introductory pricing plans or sudden jumps in monthly bills.

"While community-owned [fiber to the home] providers’ pricing is generally clear and unchanging, private providers almost always offer initial 'teaser' prices and then raise the monthly price sharply," the researchers wrote. "This price hike in the communities we studied ranged between $10 (20 percent) and $30 (42.8 percent) after 12 months, both imposed by Comcast, but in different communities."

Plucky cable billionaires defeat menace of small-town broadband

READ MORE

The study will provide welcome ammunition to groups who back the expansion of city-run broadband networks into areas underserved by major telco carriers – often rural and poor communities.

Such projects have been touted as economic boons in cities including Chattanooga, Tennessee, but have also been subject to outright bans from state governments that reasoned it is a waste of money for local governments to be competing against private ISPs.

As the study noted, however, the findings don't necessarily support the idea that muni-broadband is going to be cheaper in every corner of the US. The eggheads also cautioned that, because collecting data on internet services in multiple parts of the country is difficult, a more comprehensive follow-up is needed.

"In general we found that making comprehensive pricing comparisons among U.S. Internet service plans is extraordinarily difficult," the researchers wrote.

"The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not disseminate pricing data or track broadband availability by address. Additionally, service offerings follow no standard speed tiers or definitions (such as the specifics of video or phone service bundles)."

Ultimately, however, the team said that particularly for the lowest-tier plans, muni networks seem to be the better option.

"Our findings, though limited in scope, point to the benefits of community fiber networks in providing broadband to Americans at prices that are more affordable," the researchers concluded. ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily

20 Comments

More from The Register

Trump's CNN tantrum could delay $85bn AT&T-Time Warner merger

White House warns corpos after President's Twitter fight

AT&T insists it's not sweating US govt block of Time-Warner gobble

'We don't care, in fact look at this letter about how little we care. Really. Please look at it'

Democrats (still a thing, apparently) are super unhappy about AT&T's Time-Warner merger

Busting up telcos is on LOSER party's agenda. SAD!

Gobble away! Charter-Time Warner Cable merger OK'd by FCC

Megadeal gets go-ahead after vote

AT&T wants Time Warner

Hey, AT&T. Help us out. Why is buying Time Warner a good idea?

Execs get Bern notice to talk up $85bn deal

AT&T CEO clambers up Trump's tower, explains why he should shower gold for Time Warner

Randall Stephenson makes case for yuuuge merger

Clinton, Trump actually agree on something – blocking AT&T's Time Warner mega-buy

No matter who wins US prez race, merger faces rocky ride

Comcast, Time Warner Cable in crunch talks with FCC, DoJ over $42bn mega-merger

First major sit-down talks over monopoly fears

Yet another AWS config fumble: Time Warner Cable exposes 4 million subscriber records

US cable giant the latest victim of S3 cloud security brain-fart