Data Centre


European Commission intervenes in Microsoft Irish data centre spat

Files brief to make sure US ‘correctly understands’ EU data protection law

By Rebecca Hill


The European Commission has stepped into the ongoing battle between Microsoft and the US government to make sure European laws are “correctly understood”.

The case, which kicked off in 2014, saw the US Department of Justice take Microsoft to court over the firm’s refusal to hand over emails held on servers in Ireland.

The government argued that Microsoft should comply with the warrant, under section 2703 of the Stored Communications Act, but the biz countered that search warrants couldn’t reach beyond US borders.

In July last year the Second Circuit ruled in favour of Microsoft, but the DoJ went out about appealing the case, with its request to the Supreme Court being granted in October.

The Commission has now decided to add its voice to the debate, revealing today that it has submitted advisory material to the court on behalf of the European Union.

This is known as an amicus brief, documents filed by non-litigants that aim to give the court additional information that is relevant to the case.

The body said it had chosen to submit the brief because the transfer of personal data from the EU to the US - the issue at the heart of the case - falls under EU data protection.

“The Commission considered it to be in the interest of the EU to make sure that EU data protection rules on international transfers are correctly understood and taken into account by the US Supreme Court,” it said in a statement.

However, in its brief for the appeal case, filed yesterday (PDF), the DoJ repeated its argument that Microsoft could comply with the warrant “by undertaking acts entirely within the United States”.

It also said that Microsoft “has never stated that it would be subject to liability under the laws of Ireland or the European Union for disclosing in the United States any communications stored at its Dublin datacenter”.

The DoJ added that, “if an actual conflict of laws were to arise, our judicial system is equipped to handle that scenario. The government could exercise discretion to pursue alternate channels, where available.”

Elsewhere in the brief the DoJ noted that a court of appeals judgment (when the DoJ was denied the right to appeal) said that the Stored Communications Act focused on user privacy.

But, it argued, any invasion of privacy “occurs only when Microsoft discloses the communications to a third party”, which would happen in the US, “not in the foreign country or countries where Microsoft may decide to store the user’s emails at any given moment”.

It said that the firm “does not invade a user’s privacy” by transferring data from servers in Ireland to the US, “just as Microsoft was not restricted from migrating the specified account from the United States to Ireland in the first instance”.

The Commission said that its amicus brief “will not be in support of either one of the parties”.

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily


More from The Register

We all love bonking to pay, but if you bonk with a Windows Phone then Microsoft has bad news

Look, the platform is dead. Will you just move on already?

Microsoft partner portal 'exposes 'every' support request filed worldwide' today

Exclusive No customer data visible but hell's bells, Redmond, what have you borked now?

Home users due for a battering with Microsoft 365 subscription stick

Job opening at Redmond points to new consumer services

It’s baaack – Microsoft starts pushing out the Windows 10 October 2018 Update

Set to update automatically? Say hello to my little friend…

Born-again open-source enthusiast Microsoft rucks up at OpenChain

How do you solve a problem like compliance?

Microsoft decides Internet Explorer 10 has had its fun: Termination set for January 2020

Windows Server 2012 admins should crank it up to 11

US Department of Defense to sling an estimated $3.17bn at Microsoft resellers

Cash to be splashed over 10 years on software sporting a Microsoft badge

Surface: Tested to withstand the NFL. Microsoft firmware updates? Not so much

Windows is updating your play-by-play, this may take a while

Party pooper Microsoft pulls plug on Party Cluster

If yer name's not on Azure's list, you ain't coming in

Microsoft pulls Office 2010 updates because they're big in Japan. As in, big pain in the ASCII

Software performance tweaks have opposite effect