Apple vs. Samsung to climb back into rounded rectangle of justice

Retrial over amount of patent-pinch damages okayed by Californian judge

By Richard Chirgwin

Posted in Business, 26th October 2017 00:58 GMT

Samsung has won a retrial to reconsider damages in its patent suit against Apple.

Chaebol-versus-Cupertino was revived courtesy of Judge Lucy Koh in the Northern District of California, who agreed with Samsung that it's worth revisiting the 2012 decision that handed Apple US$399 million. Samsung's also seen other decisions compelling to pay over half a billion in total damages.

Ever since Samsung wrote those cheques, it has been trying to flip the verdict. After losing in various jurisdictions, it fronted the Supreme Court in 2016.

Its argument was that the original case applied patent too widely: given a smartphone might contain a quarter of a million patented technologies, Samsung argued, damages applying to the whole profits from a device were excessive when only a handful of infringements occurred.

The Supreme Court decided in favour of the South Korean company in December 2016, sending the case back down the line, leading to this week's decision [PDF] by Judge Koh.

She writes that “the Court finds that the jury instructions given at trial did not accurately reflect the law and that the instructions prejudiced Samsung by precluding the jury from considering whether the relevant article of manufacture for the purpose of §289 was something other than the entire phone.”

That reasoning means Judge Koh has adopted the position put forward last year in an amicus brief from the Department of Justice, which proposed a four-part test for such cases:

Submissions for the retrial are set for December, and the jury trial is currently scheduled to start in May 2018. ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily

6 Comments

More from The Register

Samsung left off Google's new official Androids-for-biz list

Five carriers make the cut, plus 32 mobile management apps - and four Chinese phone-makers

Samsung Electronics teases record Q1 profit

And yet its shares slumped. The reason? Fears of memory glut

Blackout at Samsung NAND factory destroys chunk of global supply

Just what the world needs after a year of component shortages

Samsung revival hamstrung by 2014 Google deal – analyst

Sammy can't stand out from the crowd because of non-compete pact

No, Samsung, you really do owe Apple $120m for patent infringement

US Supreme Court sends another appeal packing

Samsung heir walks free after appeals court quashes bribery charges

Lee Jae-yong to challenge remaining corruption allegations

Samsung stalls Bixby launch because it am English not so good

원숭이도 나무에서 떨어진다.

Huawei wins patent injunction against Samsung in China

All in all it's just another brick in the patent wall

Samsung topples Intel as semiconductor top dog, but lead 'literally built on sand'

Sure about that?

Samsung starts cranking out 512GB eUFS storage

Serious storage capacity is coming to tablets, smartmobes ... and beyond