Fear the SAP-slap? Users can anonymously submit questions about licensing naughtiness

Better than having to stump up £54.5m in back payments

By Rebecca Hill

Posted in Software, 11th October 2017 10:01 GMT

SAP is to offer feedback on anonymised indirect licensing as concern and confusion about the rules grows among customers.

The German firm's rules on indirect access mean customers can be hit with licensing fees to cover any and all software that connects – even indirectly – to data stored on SAP systems.

Following a high-profile court case in which booze multinational Diageo was ordered to pay SAP £54.5m in additional fees after introducing two Salesforce.com systems, there were fears others would be pursued by SAP sparking calls for clarification on the terms.

In response, SAP promised to simplify the rules, and published a white paper that aimed to offer more clarity on three common scenarios – Order to Cash, Procure to Pay and Static Read.

It also promised not to pursue back maintenance payments for customers who "proactively engage with us in good faith".

However, few users were persuaded. A recent straw poll of 50 users found that 30 per cent feared the consequences of speaking up, 36 per cent said they'd have concerns and 10 per cent said they wouldn't be happy to talk.

"The problem for most organisations is they have no idea whether they are correctly or incorrectly licensed," said Paul Cooper, chairman of the UK and Ireland SAP User Group.

"SAP's Indirect Access white paper is a start and it is good to see some clarity around three of the most popular processes SAP supports, but it is by no means comprehensive.

"Despite SAP's assurances it won't ask for back maintenance payments from organisations that are under-licensed, members have understandably been reluctant to speak with their account managers."

In a bid to encourage this conversation, SAP has created the SAP Licensing Transparency Center, to which user group members can submit anonymised use cases or scenarios and then get feedback from SAP.

The UK and Ireland user group said in a statement that the feedback would be "generic" and will "depend on the level of information provided by members".

Nonetheless, Cooper welcomed the move and hoped it would allow members to more openly seek clarification from SAP.

"Licensing remains an incredibly complex topic, so it is imperative that SAP provides as much information and education to customers as possible, with working examples that they can clearly understand," he said.

"Although members will only get generic responses to their anonymised questions, from the first couple of enquiries we have submitted, the input has certainly been useful." ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily

14 Comments

More from The Register

SAP made a mistake on its own blog - mobile platform to survive

UPDATE Cloud-herding plan still in force

SAP customers won't touch the fluffy stuff... so here's another on-prem HR data tool

ERP giant overstated cloudy SuccessFactor's success

SAP cleans up more than a dozen troubling CRM security blunders

19 vulnerabilities squished this month – get patching

SAP boss promises to cull marketing dross on community network

Bill McDermott admits hub was seen as a 'channel to promote corporate messages'

SAP gobbles customer identity management startup Gigya for $350m

Gets its mitts on juicy GDPR-friendly data security tech

SAP E-Recruiting bug could let you stop rivals poaching your people

This might be the rare case of a bug you don't want patched

SAP point-of-sale systems were totally hackable with $25 kit

Researchers able to hijack server and steal card details

SAP puts its heads in multiple clouds

Google, Azure and AWS all on board, the latter in a VMware-like managed service

SAP fondlers: IoT? Machine learning? Woah there, we still don't understand licensing

User conference opens with call for clarity on indirect access

SAP slurps up CRM biz Callidus for $2.4bn, pants: Look, cloud bookings are up!

*Cough* Bulk of sales still licences and support *cough*