Amazon dodges $1.5bn US tax bill: It's OK to run sales through Europe out of IRS reach – court

If only we could all open a Luxembourg office, eh?

By Iain Thomson in San Francisco


Champagne corks will be popping in Seattle after US taxmen lost their case against American web giant Amazon over the non-payment of taxes on overseas earnings.

On Thursday, the US Tax Court ruled [PDF] in favor of Amazon, saying it was legal for the internet souk to channel its European sales through a low-tax Luxembourg subsidiary in 2005 and 2006, rather than America. Had it lost, Amazon could have faced a US tax bill as high as $1.5bn, and lower profits for future years. (Uncle Sam wanted the Jeff Bezos-led biz to cough up $234m, but that's now moot.)

Amazon US sold the rights to parts of its technology and the trademark for that technology to its European subsidiaries, for a lump sum plus annual payments. As a result, Amazon Europe operated independently and its revenues were out of reach from the IRS – the US government's tax collectors. Its investigators weren't happy with this arrangement.

This financial operation began in 2004, and was dubbed Project Goldcrest after the national bird of Luxembourg. The European company Amazon set up wasn't a shell company, the judgment states, since it played a significant role in creating new Amazon services in the UK, France, Germany, and Ireland.

The court found that the IRS had overstated what it thought Amazon's Goldcrest subsidiary should have paid for the intangible assets of its American parent company. The judgment states that the IRS' "determination with respect to the buy-in payment is arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable."

Amazon won't be the only one celebrating. Such tax avoidance is common among technology companies and other multinationals. The ruling will have a chilling effect on the IRS' – and other countries' tax authorities' – plans to go after other overseas earnings.

Amazon had no statement on the case at time of going to press. ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily


More from The Register

Amazon tries to ruin infosec world's fastest-growing cottage industry (finding data-spaffing S3 storage buckets)

AWS comes up with blanket policies to smother public-facing cloud silos

Automated Weather Source didn't see this cloud coming: Amazon snatches up

Uh, we'll be having that domain

Oh, Bucket! AWS in S3 status-checking tool free-for-all

'Your data is waiting for the internet to download it' warning lights are now free

What now, Larry? AWS boss insists Amazon will have dumped Oracle database by end of 2019

re:Invent Clock's ticking on Ellison's smack talk

Who's leaving Amazon S3 buckets open online now? Cybercrooks, US election autodialers

Hundreds of thousands of voter records and contact info spilled

Amazon's answer to all those leaky AWS S3 buckets: A dashboard warning light

Updated Look out for that orange alert

Millions of scraped public social net profiles left in open AWS S3 box

Poorly configured cloud buckets strike again – this time, Localbox fingered

Datrium shifts disasters up the Amazon: Adds DR in AWS for on-prem kit

Locks out 3rd party DRaaS folk with VM-centric cloud stuff

Amazon tried to entice Latin American officials with $5m in Kindles, AWS credits for .amazon

Brazil, Peru snub cheap gifts, refuse to unblock dot-word

When it absolutely, positively needs to be leaked overnight: 120k FedEx customer files spill from AWS S3 silo

Passport scans, drivers licenses, etc, exposed online