Business

Policy

Arrr: The only Pirate in European Parliament to weigh in on copyright

Hmmm. What do YOU think 19 January report will say?

By Jennifer Baker in Brussels

16 SHARE

As speculation and arguments mount over proposed EU copyright legislation, the Pirate Party MEP will publish her report on the matter on 19 January.

Julia Reda, currently the only Pirate in the European Parliament, has been made “rapporteur” on the implementation of the previous directive on the so-called 2001 Infosoc Directive.

Collecting societies, publishers and artists have likened this to putting the wolf in charge of the sheep. If we accept the analogy, it’s probably a lot like asking the wolf’s opinion on how the shepherd has been doing and then taking that into account when telling the shepherd what to do next.

It is fairly predictable that Reda’s report will come down hard on any measures that have sought to criminalise private copying and will recommend avoiding anything that seeks to inhibit such “personal-use” copying of protected works in the future.

However, the first bite at the new expected copyright law cake will go to new digi Commissioner Günther H-dot Oettinger - a man who made his first speech after his appointment to the German publishers association and who wants news aggregators to pay a so-called “Google tax” to publishers for using snippets of their articles.

The European Copyright Society recently wrote to Oetti begging for an "actual Union-wide unification of copyright" as opposed to simply further harmonising the existing EU copyright regime would have "several major advantages".

But as intellectual property law expert Iain Connor of Pinsent Masons, said in El Reg, a new copyright law could be as much as 10 years away and, as is the way with EU laws, the end result will likely turn out to be a mishmash compromise between Oettinger’s and Reda’s positions.

However in giving Reda the job of reviewing the current law at this time (Oettinger has promised a first draft of a new law in six months), the Pirate Party maintains, European Parliament is suggesting to “Big Entertainment - or perhaps more pertinently Big American Entertainment - that it means business".

Possibly. The first consideration of Reda’s report will be in committee on 20 January. ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily

16 Comments

More from The Register

Cheeky cheesemaker fails to copyright how things taste

On yer bike, CJEU tells Dutch dairy dealer

What links US Supreme Court, copyright legal bills, and stadium hot dog prices? A: Oracle

You can't full me, Larry: Rimini swerves $13m invoice in crucial ruling on 'full' versus 'all'

YouTube supremo says vid-streaming-slash-piracy giant can't afford EU's copyright overhaul

Editorial oversight contemplated by article 13 creates too much financial risk

Supremes agree to hear Rimini Street's bid to claw back costs in Oracle copyright battle

Top US court will resolve circuit courts' split over non-taxable costs

US Supremes urged by pretty much everyone in software dev to probe Oracle's 'disastrous' Java API copyright win

Microsoft, Red Hat, Mozilla, EFF, and more want lower court ruling scrapped

SAP can't thwack away Teradata's copyright infringement, antitrust sueball

But US firm must get specific on which trade secrets it claims were nicked – judge

UN's freedom of expression top dog slams European copyright plans

Rapporteur David Kaye not impressed with Article 13

OK, Google? Probably not! EU settles on wording for copyright reform legislation

Commission fumes at 'fake' campaign

Petty PETA rapped by judges over monkey selfie copyright stunt

Animals can sue, but don't have the ability to file intellectual property lawsuits

Word on the street: Rimini takes Oracle copyright battle to US Supremes

Complains costs were 17% higher cos of where case was heard