Business

Policy

Google Tax part 94: EU's H-dot wavers over copyright levy

Here’s a little number about charging the Choc Factory

By Jennifer Baker in Brussels

31 SHARE

EU digi-chief Gunther H-dot Oettinger has been characteristically clear as mud in explaining his plans for copyright reform.

Speaking on Wednesday night to the European Parliament’s working group on copyright, H-dot seemed to call for a so-called ancillary copyright law. This type of law, which requires news aggregators to pay royalties to publishers for using snippets of stories, has already been tried in Germany and Spain.

Of course, the biggest aggregator by far in Europe is Google - hence the pithier name “Google tax”.

In Germany, the Chocolate Factory called the publishers’ bluff, and royalty-collecting agencies gave the ad machine/search giant a free pass after it threatened to stop listing publications on Google News.

In Spain, the more recent law has had an even more catastrophic effect: Google has pulled its news service from the country altogether. Now the very publishers that wanted legislation to guarantee them royalties are lobbying their government to repeal the law. The Spanish law is stricter than the German one in that publishers cannot voluntarily waive their right to charge royalties.

As Spanish digital rights lawyer Diego Naranjo pointed out: "It’s not a Google tax, it is a NOT-Google tax".

“By pursuing an EU-wide ancillary copyright law for press publishers, Oettinger is ignoring the recent spectacular failure of similar laws in Germany and Spain. They did not fail because they were implemented at the wrong level, but because the idea itself is wrong-headed,” said Pirate Party MEP Julia Reda.

In a fine example of not sticking to his guns, H-dot took to that thing called Twitter to say:

Back in October, before he took office, the big H-dot was keen to tell the German press that he wanted to find a way to “protect intellectual works” and “demand a levy from Google”.

“If Google takes intellectual property from the EU and works with it, the EU can protect this property and can demand a charge for it,” he told the daily newspaper Handelsblatt.

All we can be sure of at this point is that he will present something before the end of 2015. Probably. We hope. ®

Sign up to our NewsletterGet IT in your inbox daily

31 Comments

More from The Register

Just for EU, just for EU, just for EU: Forget about enforcing Right To Be Forgotten outside member states

Top court receives advice paraphrasing M People*

EU Android latest: Critics diss Google's money-spinning 'cure'

You shouldn't profit from punishment

How politics works, part 97: Telecoms industry throws a fundraiser for US senator night before he oversees, er, a telecoms privacy hearing

Nothing like a little reminder of who's really in charge

Lovely website you got there. Would be a shame if we, er, someone were to sink it: Google warns EU link tax will magnify media monetary misery

Let us copy your snippets, or say goodbye to revenue

OK, Google? Probably not! EU settles on wording for copyright reform legislation

Commission fumes at 'fake' campaign

So, about that Google tax on Android makers in the EU – report pegs it at up to $40 per phone

Fee offset if Search and Chrome included alongside Play Store, of course

Post-Brexit plan for .EU tweaked: No dot-EU web domains for Europeans in UK, no appeals, etc

It's not up there with looming food, medicine shortages, but it's still rather annoying

Google risks mega-fine in EU over location 'stalking'

Special Report First big test for GDPR looms

Looming EU copyright rules – tackling Google news article scraping, installing upload filters – under fire from all sides

Analysis The question now is: Will it move forward or not?

Not heard owt bad about Huawei, says EU Commish infosec bod

Interview But you'll love our sticker scheme... right?