Why does Uber keep its drivers' pay so low? Ex-CFO: 'Cos we can'
Some men just want to watch the world burn
In an interview on Sunday's episode of Wall Street Week, Mike Novogratz, principal and director of investment firm Fortress Investments, who was speaking about corporate greed and income inequality, explained his thoughts with an anecdote about former Uber CFO Brent Callinicos.
Callinicos, who had previously been a bean-counter at Google, announced his decision to leave his role Uber in March.
Although Novogratz did not mention Callinicos by name, the anecdote is set during a period in which he was CFO.
Novogratz began by noting that, regardless of whether America has had a Republican or Democratic administration, the percentage of earnings going to capital, versus labour, has decreased over the last 35 years.
Mulling over this phenomenon, he recalled: "I had an interesting meeting with the CFO of Uber [...] and they were raising capital. [They] had started their [fund-raising] roadshow at twenty five billion dollars valuation, and a week later the valuation had jumped to forty."
"And I asked [the CFO], how do you justify the valuation? So he took me through their business model, and roughly, employees – drivers – get between twenty and twenty five per cent of the fare. And the thought was if we could raise that to twenty five to thirty per cent [...] our margins would go up, and if you look at the growth and you add that extra, pure margin, we make a lot more money and we justify this forty billion dollar valuation."
"And I asked a cheeky question," said Novogratz. "'Well, listen, you've got happy employees, you've got happy customers, you've got happy shareholders. The holy triumvirate are all really excited about your company. Why are you going to risk that and push the employees' salary down by five per cent?'"
And without missing a beat, according to Novogratz, Callinicoss simply replied: “Because we can.”
Uber had not replied to an invitation to comment at the time of publication.