NO ONE is making money from YouTube, even Google – report

So what is the idiot-viewing platform actually for?

Close-up of a YouTube logo as viewed on a computer screen in close up...

It seems no one is making money from online goggle box YouTube, least of all Google – despite reports that the company generated $4bn (£2.6bn) revenue last year.

While YouTube accounted for about six per cent of Google’s overall sales last year, it didn’t contribute to earnings, a source told the Wall Street Journal.

YouTube's revenue increased by $1bn (£644m) in 2014. But after paying for content and the equipment to deliver speedy videos, YouTube’s bottom line is “roughly break-even,” the source told the paper.

YouTube's "content generators" have also complained that the service also leaves them out of pocket.

Last month the treatment of independent musicians by the company came under the spotlight again when cellist Zoë Keating alleged that Google had attempted to get to her to agree to unfavourable new YouTube terms.

She claimed that Google's reps had told her that if she refused to sign the new deal, Google would stop paying her, but it could continue to use her music on YouTube. The company said her claims were "patently false".

Google bought YouTube in 2006 for $1.65bn (£1.06bn).

Since then YouTube has made no secret of its desire to tap into new revenue streams, having this week announced an app for kids that will be funded by "child-friendly" advertising.

In its fourth quarter, Google said its TrueView service, where advertisers only pay the company when viewers choose to watch their ad, was up 25 per cent compared with the fourth quarter of 2014.

El Reg has contacted Google for a comment. ®

Sponsored: Detecting cyber attacks as a small to medium business

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER


Related

Value pack of two tins of Spam

Wondering where that upcoming meeting with 'Cheap Viagra' came from? Spammers beat Gmail filters by abusing Google Calendar, Forms, Photos, Analytics...

Kaspersky fingers pro-G filters for letting cyber-muck through
Woman says oops after data breach... or spome other mistake, possibly. Illustration by Shutterstock/sergey sobin

Google Takeout a bit too true to its name after potentially 1000s of private videos shared with complete strangers

1% of 1% of users affected, but as it's Google that's still in the six figures
facial

You're responsible for getting permission from subjects if you want to use Windows Photos' facial recog feature

Microsoft gets nervous, dumps burden of consent on users
Someone measuring radioactivity

Facebook mulls tagging pics with 'radioactive' markers to trace the origin of photos used to build image-recog AI

Invisible watermarks can be detected in trained software to root out theft, benchmark cheating, etc
model_selfie

Google, YouTube, Twitter tell face-rec upstart Clearview to stop harvesting people's content – that's their job

Updated Tech-for-cops CEO claims First Amendment rights as a legal defense
kings_cross_police

Oops, wait, yeah, we did hand over photos for King's Cross facial-recog CCTV, cops admit

Mayor apologizes, joins privacy watchdogs in probing use of technology in bustling corner of UK capital
Google Glass Enterprise Edition 2

Boss planning to tear you a new one? Google Glass is back: Weird workwear aimed at devs, but on sale to all

Calm down, Glass EE2's a 'single purpose tool for Enterprise'. Mainly
Royal Courts of Justice/Law Courts in london, england (High Court & Court of Appeal of England and Wales)

Azure consultant's Google image search results hotlinking sueball booted off the pitch by High Court

British copyright law probably wasn't right way to do this one

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2020