This article is more than 1 year old

Boffins baffled by the glowing 'plumes' of MARS

Aurora? Cloud? Alien starship exhaust? What?

A group of amateur astronomers has discovered a tricky conundrum for the professionals, documenting atmospheric plumes - or something that looks uncannily like them - above Mars... where they should not occur.

The observations, made in March 2012 and written up for Nature here (PDF), found plumes in the Red Planet's atmosphere at between 200 and 250km above the surface.

As lead author of the paper, Professor Agustín Sanchez-Lavega of the University of the Basque Country in Spain, notes the plumes “challenge our current knowledge about the Martian atmosphere”.

It's the altitude of the plumes that's problematic, as the researchers note. Ice crystals can form atmospheric plumes, but the paper notes that these occur below 100km altitude; dust storms max out at 37km.

If the plumes' origin can't be determined, the University's release says, they could pose a hazard to low-orbit Mars missions.

It's feasible that the plumes could be some kind of aurora, but the paper states that if it is, it's 1,000 times brighter than aurorae seen in Earth's atmosphere.

First observed on 12 March 2012, the plumes were detected for 11 consecutive days, with observations on 20 and 21 March seen by “at least 18 observers employing 20-40 cm telescopes at wavelengths from blue to red (450-650 nm)”.

The mysterious plume in Mars' atmosphere

The mysterious plumes. Source: University of the Basque Country

The plumes were spotted at the day-night boundary (the terminator), extending between 500 and 1,000 km in both the north-south and east-west directions, appearing at roughly -45° latitude / 195° west longitude.

According to Discovery, the aurora theory is regarded as unlikely, professor Sanchez-Lavega (lead author of the paper) describes the “immense energetic flux” required for an aurora as “unrealistic”.

Sanchez-Lavega's preferred explanation is that the plumes reveal something new about Mars' meteorology: for water or carbon dioxide to condense like this at 200km would require a large temperature drop, “something not foreseen by any atmospheric model”. ®

More about

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like