Creating more harmony around end user computing
Compromise is not a dirty word
Tensions frequently arise between business units and the IT teams as users have become more informed and opinionated, and sought greater levels of freedom and flexibility around the technology they use at work. Against this background, the key to creating and maintaining harmony is to prioritise tangible business interests above both user desires and IT’s natural conservatism. The right kind of compromises can then be achieved to drive maximum business benefit.
The voice of the user is getting louder and stronger
There was a time when end user computing largely revolved around Wintel PCs deployed and managed by the IT department. The kind of equipment provided to an employee would typically be determined by a combination of business and operational needs. Wherever possible, standardisation would be enforced to make securing, administering and supporting the environment easier and more efficient.
If you are lucky enough as an IT person to be still living in this world, then enjoy it while it lasts, because the nature of end user computing is changing rapidly.
The results of a recent Reg reader study conducted by Freeform Dynamics capture the work-related impact of the phenomenal rise of smartphone and tablet adoption in the consumer space.
Over the last few years users have become a lot more informed and opinionated, and many organisations are seeing growth in the influence of user preferences and desires on end user technology related decisions (Figure 1).
The following comments gathered during the research provide a flavour of the feedback we received on the changes taking place:
“We are seeing more mobile working and a more diverse range of devices.”
“More and more staff want to use something they are familiar with.”
“Users are now demanding specific brands.”
And resisting the user voice is hard or even impossible when senior managers are the ones making the demands:
“The directors all asked for iPads, so they got them.”
“Cost is no barrier between senior execs and the devices they want.”
But it doesn’t stop at people simply lobbying to get what they want.
IT teams can no longer control all technology acquisition
Whether it is in response to an unmet need, or a personal preference or desire, some employees are bypassing policy and process and acquiring technology independently of the IT department (Figure 2).
To summarise what this chart is telling us, the majority of organisations are seeing unilateral adoption of technology among business units and/or users at a level which can no longer be ignored. The breadth of activity is noteworthy too. It’s not just about smartphones and tablets, but also PCs, Macs, software and services.
The tensions are rising and the disharmony is growing
Looking at statistical information such as that presented above doesn’t convey the impact on relationships, or the way in which organisational harmony is often being undermined. The frustrations are clear on both the business and IT sides of the house:
“If a decent sized IT department can’t support iOS, Android and Windows, maybe the dudes doing the work should apply for new jobs.”
“As an employee, I see the lack of flexibility as a negative indicator of the organisational culture; it is symptomatic of an organisation with an oppressive IT environment.”
“Upper management has OK'd BYOD, ignoring input and warnings from IT, but users are mostly clueless about their real needs. Some devices will just not work in our environment, then people get angry when we can’t fix it.”
“End users and business management have lost any understanding of security and responsibility in the rush to be seen as fashionable.”
So what can be done to help resolve the kind of differences that are arising in this highly emotive area?
The trick is to break out the different sets of interests
One of the fundamental principles that must be accepted, particularly among business stakeholders, is that user desires and business needs are not always well aligned. Indeed, they can often be in direct conflict with each other as this very shrewd observation from one study participant sums up quite nicely:
“Individual needs and wants must come second to solutions being fit for purpose, cost effective and secure. Looking cool and liking the device, while nice, is not exactly what the shareholders are interested in.”
Accepting also that IT teams can sometimes be a little too overbearing from a control perspective, potentially inhibiting progress, a need for more compromise all round is clearly necessary. When talking through options, however, discussions become a lot easier if you set them against the backdrop of hard-core business needs. A good tool to use here is something we call the triangle of interests (Figure 3).
It’s worth having the triangle of interests sitting in the middle of the table or scribbled on the whiteboard when business and IT teams get together to talk through priorities and consider whether user requests can be accommodated. When conflict arises, hard-core business needs must clearly trump either of the other two sets of interests, but you can also identify areas for necessary investment. It may be, for example, that an apparently self-serving user request is actually masking an important opportunity to boost employee productivity. You will also come across situations in which the IT team is resisting a proposal because the infrastructure and tools are not in place to implement it safely, securely and effectively.
If you are interested in gaining more insights into this important and fascinating area, we would encourage you to read the full research report entitled “The Politics and Practicalities of End User Computing”.
Sponsored: Becoming a Pragmatic Security Leader