IDC's explicit snapshot: Everyone who's anyone in object storage: In 3D
Magic Quadrant? Pshaw. Check out our boxtastic MarketScape
Analyst IDC has ranked object storage suppliers in a pretty 3D marketscape chart, and Cleversafe leads the pack.
A marketscape chart, apparently, is a four-box diagram with wavy edges and overlapping boxes, labelled Participants, Contenders, Major Players and Leaders. It positions vendors on two axes; the upright one is capabilities (presumably low to high) and the bottom one is strategies (presumably crap to great).
The Capabilities axis "examines how well a vendor has aligned its solution to market demand... Positioning on the x-axis (or strategies axis) reflects the alignment of the future strategies of the vendor and the vendor's corresponding OBS solution to forecast market demand (three to five years)."
The object (sorry) of the exercise is to get to the top right corner, the leaders’ area.
IDC says it uses rigorous scoring and much discussion with vendors to position them in its definitely-not-a magic-quadrant four-box square space. However, there is a massive puzzle here; why do the sectioned-off areas have parallel curved edges? We suspect it’s to point up the difference with Gartner's straight-edged magic quadrants – just marketing in other words.
Anyway, on the chart from the “IDC MarketScape : Worldwide Object -Based Storage 2013 Vendor Assessment”, the size of a vendor’s circle indicates its relative market share. IDC says it adds a plus or a minus sign to each vendor to show whether it is progressing towards the leaders’ apex position or away from it. The example above comes from Scality, number two in the chart, and doesn’t include these signs of progress or lack of it.
The leaders’ group consists of Cleversafe, Scality, EMC, DataDirect and Amplidata. EMC has the biggest circle and it overlaps, as does Amplidata’s into the Major Players’ section. Here we have these two plus Caringo, Hitachi Data Systems, NetApp and Cloudian to left and right of the main left-to-right diagonal, and Basho Technologies.
The Contenders include Basho, Tarmin, Huawei and NEC. There is no vendors in the Participants’ section.
In effect, we think, the marketscape is like a Venn diagram. Obviously all vendors in it are participants. All contenders and participants and contenders. All major players are contenders and participants and the leaders must be major players too … or is our logic breaking down?
IDC says “Object-based storage (OBS) is still a market in its infancy and several suppliers of commercial OBS solutions have struggled to generate a meaningful revenue stream from their offerings.”
Ashish Nadkarni, IDC’s Research Director Storage Systems, said: “What makes this market segment and this MarketScape interesting is the dynamic push/pull between commercial OBS architectures and the open source momentum we are seeing with OpenStack. This has strategic implications for the industry as a whole.”
IDC’s conclusion is that: “Market forces such fierce competition and buyer demand will accelerate the metamorphosis of this market into a mature market with only a few dominant vendors. Open source–based stacks will create an additional dimension of complexity and challenges. In all likelihood, the only survivors in this market may be vendors with robust partner ecosystems and/or vendors with commercial variants of open source platforms.”
IDC mentions Exablox, Inktank (Ceph), SwiftStack, and Quantum in its report.
Scality’s Philippe Nicholas, product strategy director, blogged (in French) about the result, saying:
- We can already eliminate Amplidata [since it is at] the edge of the abyss confirmed if necessary … here in the Denver Super Computing [show]
- EMC and its very famous Atmos, invisible in the market but driven by the world leader in storage, so we know why EMC is listed.
- That leaves the three most active market players; Cleversafe, DDN and Scality
- Cleversafe is very limited (single object, macro mode file) but enjoys pioneer status
- DDN has its SAN and NAS and WOS
- Scality is the only one with an exascale-class offering
DDN would disagree with that last statement and Amplidata would disagree with the first.
In the extract, IDC points out: "To insulate itself from the fallout of potential M&A [Merger and Acquisition] activity, Quantum would be better served in finding a longer-term solution wherein it has ownership rights to this IP regardless of what happens to Amplidata." ®