Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2014/04/08/yahoo_breaks_every_mailing_list_in_the_world_says_email_guru/

'Yahoo! Breaks! Every! Mailing! List! In! The! World!' says email guru

Purple Palace tweaks security setting, sparks worldwide email bounce blizzard

By Simon Sharwood

Posted in Security, 8th April 2014 06:19 GMT

Email luminary John Levine has accused Yahoo! of sabotaging email lists for everyone, everywhere.

In a post titled “Yahoo! Breaks! Every! Mailing! List! In! The! World! Including! The! IETF's!'”, Levin explains “an emerging e-mail security scheme” called DMARC that “lets a domain owner make assertions about the From: address, in particular that mail with their domain on the From: line will have a DKIM signature with the same domain, or a bounce address in the same domain that will pass SPF [sender policy framework.”

Levine explains that DMARC has weaknesses, notably because “Lists invarably [sic] use their own bounce address in their own domain, so the SPF doesn't match. Lists generally modify messages via subject tags, body footers, attachment stripping, and other useful features that break the DKIM signature. So on even the most legitimate list mail like, say, the IETF's, most of the mail fails the DMARC assertions, not due to the lists doing anything 'wrong'.”

Most of the time that's not a big problem for the world at large. But Levine says “over the weekend Yahoo published a DMARC record with a policy saying to reject all yahoo.com mail that fails DMARC.”

Aside from lots of bounced emails that should go through, here's what Levine says will result from Yahoo!'s change:

“Since Yahoo mail provokes bounces from lots of other mail systems, innocent subscribers at Gmail, Hotmail, etc. not only won't get Yahoo subscribers' messages, but all those bounces are likely to bounce them off the lists.”

In other words lots of email not getting through, lots of automatic unsubscribes and lots of angry users and sysadmins.

Levine offers three suggestions to ameliorate the situation:

Who wants to be the one to action the third suggestion? ®