Facebook stock plunge leaves tax-dodge Saverin WORSE off. Haa ha
Imagine one's concern
While taking a break from sipping Cristal Champagne at his home in tax-haven Singapore, Eduardo Saverin - who stumped up $30,000 to get Facebook going when he was Mark Zuckerberg's roommate at Harvard - sparked a political firestorm last month when he renounced his American citizenship ahead of the social network's stock market debut.
The move provoked much vituperation to the point where a senator or two called for him to be banned from the States: it was assumed the change in citizenship was a manoeuvre to avoid paying tax on any gains from his share of the social networking website, a claim Saverin strongly refuted.
However, given the plummeting Facebook share price, Saverin's renunciation pre-IPO will leave him more out of pocket than if he had waited until after Zuck tumbled down the Nasdaq. For on the day Saverin ditched his citizenship he had to calculate a tax bill for the US government based on everything he owned, and that was higher back then than it would be now.
Felix Salmon has the chart here. It shows what Facebook was worth on online marketplace SecondMarket last autumn. And the bit that you need to know is that upon the day Saverin gave up his passport, he was taxed as if he had sold all of his belongings.
Yes, everything: all capital gains became taxable at that point. And as you can see, the IRS has a pretty good idea of what those Facebook shares were worth then, and that's the number that will be on Saverin's bill. It doesn't matter what happens to the share price in the future, that's the bill he's stuck with.
Which of course means that if Facebook soars to the stars then his bill has been reduced. However, as us curmudgeons on the El Reg financial desk mutter, if we don't even see that opening price again, then he's stuck with that tax bill.
Certainly, as matters stand, given that his tax bill will have been calculated at that higher price, his renunciation of his citizenship has increased, not reduced, the levy on his Facebook stock.
Which you can take any way you like really, but it's hardly the sort of favour we should be encouraging politicians to do something about, is it? ®