Original URL: https://www.theregister.com/2010/07/20/apple_location_policies/

Apple details privacy policies for US Congressmen

Not sharing location info with carriers

By Rik Myslewski

Posted in Legal, 20th July 2010 00:17 GMT

Apple has sent Congress an explanation of its location-based information-gathering and privacy policies.

The 13-page letter letter from Apple's general counsel Bruce Sewell sent on July 12, in direct response to a "Dear Mr. Jobs" letter penned late last month by US Representatives Edward J. Markey and Joe Barton, co-chairs of the House Bi-Partisan Privacy Caucus.

Markey and Barton's letter, which included nine specific questions, was prompted by modifications to Apple's overall Privacy Policy, and to the Terms and Conditions with which you must agree before downloading items from the iTunes Store or App Store. Those modifications included the following:

To provide location-based services on Apple products, Apple and our partners and licensees may collect, use, and share precise location data, including the real-time geographic location of your Apple computer or device. This location data is collected anonymously in a form that does not personally identify you and is used by Apple and our partners and licensees to provide and improve location-based products and services. For example, we may share geographic location with application providers when you opt in to their location services.

That language raised a red flag not only to Markey and Barton, but also to many an Apple customer concerned about his or her online, location, and personal-information privacy.

Sewell's letter is intended to calm those concerns. He says, among other things:

And in response to Markey and Barton's question: "Is Apple sharing consumer location information collected through iPhones and iPads with AT&T or other telecommunications carriers?", Sewell's answer was succinct: "No."

Markey and Barton have released statements that indicated an overall comfort with Sewell's assurances. Markey noted that: "Consumer consent is the key to assessing the adequacy of privacy protections, and Apple's responses provide examples of how consumers can grant or withhold consent in their usage of Apple products."

Barton expressed both praise and misgivings: "While I applaud Apple for responding to our questions, I remain concerned about privacy policies that run on for pages and pages."

Finally, as thorough as Sewell's answers may be — much more info can be found in the letter itself — it's important to remember that the questions Apple was responding to concerned just one type of personalization: location-based services. As The Reg reported earlier this month, Apple does have another ad-targeting trick up it sleeve: your personal iTune Store and App Store buying histories. ®