Original URL: https://www.theregister.com/2007/05/25/review_hitachi_deskstar_7k1000/

Hitachi Deskstar 7K1000 hard drive

Hitachi unleashes TB on the world - that's terabyte

By Leo Waldock

Posted in Channel, 25th May 2007 11:02 GMT

Review Hitachi's 'world's first' 3.5in terabyte desktop hard drive looks much like any other hard drive currently available, but it packs in five platters and ten read/write heads for an exceptional data storage capacity.

Deskstar 7K1000 hard drive

In the event you don't want or need an enormous amount of storage, you can still buy a Deskstar 7K500 between 320GB (£50) and 500GB (£110), so the pricing of the new drives falls in line with the existing products. That's a pleasant surprise as you usually get hit with a premium for buying the latest and greatest. However, the 7K1000 is still twice the price of many 500GB models.

Incidentally, there's a second, 750GB model in the 7K1000 range that's £70 less, if you feel the £225 1TB model too pricey.

The 7K1000's specification is fairly predictable: the platters spin at 7,200rpm, there's a 3Gbps SATA interface and, like all high-capacity hard drives these days, the platters uses the perpendicular magnetic recording technqiue to cram more media into every square inch. From here on in the surprise will come when a new drive doesn't use perpendicular.

Hitachi has increased the cache to 32MB, which is probably cheaper than buying a 16MB chip these days, but more cache doesn't improve performance. Rather it ensures that there is no bottleneck in performance. The 7K1000 supports Native Command Queuing (NCQ) as any good SATA II drive should. There's an old school four-pin Molex power connector next to the two SATA connectors.

On the face of it, the only obvious change from the previous-generation 7K500 to 7K1000 is the capacity increase, but there are other, more subtle changes if you know where to look. Download the HD Feature Tool utility, which is a .EXE file that self-extracts to create a bootable floppy. Start up off this disc and you can configure the drive, with options to enable SMART and limit the capacity of the drive, and you'll also see an option for Automatic Acoustic Management (AAM).

AAM is a slider control with Quiet at one end and Performance at the other. The difference between the two extremes is slight, but measurable by monitoring the drive's noise levels and performance. You'll also see a difference in the 7K1000's power draw. Our review unit was set up for performance, though retail units and drives pre-installed in PCs may not be. Even on a peformance settings the noise levels were still incredibly low. Forget about the 29dBA noise level at idle as all drives are quiet when they're not working but instead focus on the 32dBA seek noise level.

That's extraordinarily quiet and for comparison let's look at a performance king, the Western Digital Raptor 150, which has an average seek noise level of 36dBA. The current leader in capacity, the Seagate Barracuda 7200.10, is rated at 37dBA so it's clear that the Hitachi is very, very quiet. But how does its performance compare?

The synthetic HD Tach 3 test shows impressive results that are comparable with the WD Raptor 150 and so too does the HDD element of PCMark05.

HDTach test
Hitachi 7K1000 - HDTach results
Burst/write/read speed tests: longer bars are better
Random access time test: shorter bars are better

PCMark05 HDD test
Hitachi 7K1000 - PCMark 05 HDD results
Longer bars are better

A simple data-transfer test using 4GB of movie files was less conclusive as the Hitachi seemed to be somewhat slower than the Seagate 7200.10 750GB. Writing files to the 7K1000 was very fast but a long sustained read started very briskly for the first couple of gigabytes although it then slowed down quite noticeably towards the end.

4GB read/write test
Hitachi 7K1000 - 4GB read/write test results
Values in seconds. Shorter bars are better

Verdict

We were very impressed with the Hitachi 7K1000. It's exceptionally quiet yet it delivers top-notch performance at a very reasonable price. We have no idea how you're supposed to back up a drive of this capacity, but that's hardly Hitachi's problem.