Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/07/25/letters_2507/

Stem cells flee DC for Xanadu

Using very pricey passports

By Lucy Sherriff

Posted in Letters, 25th July 2006 16:20 GMT

Letters Bush has used his presidential veto for the first time to scupper the federal funding for stem cell research. We understand Nancy Reagan is not happy with him. And neither were you. We wanted to include a letter of Bush-support, for balance, but we didn't get ANY:   "The president is not going to get on the slippery slope of taking something living and making it dead for the purposes of scientific research."

Guess it's time to outlaw medical research involving live animals, then.

No, I don't advocate that! But it is what's implied by the statement their moron of a press secretary made. Who the hell does the hiring at the White House?

-- Aaron


Jack Snow stated, and I paraphrase, the simplistic answer is that the president thinks murder's wrong.  Oh really? But murder to creat regime-change leading to imbalance in the form of civil war, further sectarian division in the Middle East and the resulting threat of a Third World War is NOT wrong??   "The president is not going to get on the slippery slope of taking something living and making it dead for the purposes of scientific research."   What an idiot. Taking something living and making it dead is something that drives much valuable research. We hope that it's only done when necessary and with minimal pain but we do it all the time when it comes to animal research. Again, a simplistic attitude.   It would be good, then, for this president to get off the slippery slope by resigning immediately.  It is not up to King George to decide here or around the world what constitutes murder and what does not.

It's ironic that the one promise he keeps is his attempt to deny hope to millions of Americans suffering from potentially curable disease if science is allowed to proceed unfettered, yet approves of killing thousands of innocent Iraqis, Lebanese, Israelis and Palestinians, not mention torturing anyone he chooses. It is just as philisophically reprehensible to allow misery as it is to create misery, but this is something beyond Bush's intellectual powers to appreciate.

Carl


 "The simple answer is he thinks murder's wrong."   ...and simple is the word.   ;)

E-

Well, if murder is wrong, murder is wrong. Following that to its logical conclusion, we await the, no doubt imminent, suspension of the death penalty in Texas.


The latest fluffy survey on consumer habits got a bit personal, investigating the likelihood that we Brits would keep our phones switched on when, ahem, shagging. Turns out, we don't bother. But is anyone all that surprised?   Not surprising that Britons will not turn off their cell phones when engaged in rumpy-pumpy. 

Britons are not noted for their abilities in the bedroom (certain MPs being  noted exceptions) now if only one in seven Italians refused to turn off their cell phone in the boudoir THAT would be news, cheers.

James


".... lest they get a txt msg from their m8 asking if they fncy a pnt."

you mean in case the missus calls :)

Steve


 Only one in seven switch off their phones during sex

...indeed.  But honestly, who actually thinks about their phone when gettin' down.  I know I have more important things to think about than whether or not my cellphone is on when I'm about to do the dirty. 

And frankly, I'm not old enough yet to have a definite day when I have sex("Tuesday is sex night!"), so the spontanaety kinda prevents me from turning off my phone beforehand.   - Albert


And a little light pedantry before we make our way to page 2:

Chris,

Enjoyed your article on the Brits' propensity for leaving their phones on during rumpy-pumpy.

I really enjoy El Reg for the well-written articles and the playful use of the Queen's English, but I have come to expect proper grammar (something embarrassingly lacking in the US media), so it came as some surprise to spot the following in the Booknote section of your article:

"Most worryingly for we at Vulture Central ..."

Surely you mean "Most worryingly for us at Vulture Central ..."? Or has my American education failed me once again?

Best regards, Scott Simpson Fort Wayne, IN


<pedant>

"for we" ???

</pedant>

Have a good one

Chris Miller

"Us few, us happy few, us band of brothers..."?

'nuff said.

This next story could shed light on why we keep our phone switched on during the most intimate moments: we don't understand how the damn things work:

“Apologists would argue that a modern mobile phone is closer in complexity to a laptop than an iPod, so a less intuitive user experience is inevitable.”

Actually, the phone companies appear to have forgotten that it’s supposed to be a phone.

As it’s complexity increases it’s usefulness at this purpose decreases. How about paying some attention to managing Contacts usably? Or allowing me to schedule calls at a certain time? My old Nokia 6510 could do these things simply and intuitively. My ‘smart’ Nokia 7610 that can’t manage either. That’s why I’m looking for an old phone on ebay.

Nick Wallis


What the mobile industry (and press, to judge by certain articles in The Register) fails to appreciate is how badly they've screwed up the basic functionality of the cell phone.  My relatively old Motorola v60 didn't have a lot of bells and whistles, but it did make phone calls and allow phone book entries to be created intuitively. 

My new Nokia, by contrast, started off in an extremely unintuitive interface mode and requires delving into endless nested menus to do something as simple as change the phone to "vibrate." 

After a few days of using the Nokia, I was practically at the point of wanting to send it back, not for being broken, but just for being irritating. 

I've gotten used to my landline phone company trying to sell me all sorts of useless services, but the basic phone itself has always remained simple, functional, and reliable.  I don't really want or need data services; the only thing I would really use them for is Google Maps, but that's not worth the grotesque extra expense of getting a data-capable phone and data-rate account.

That is, of course, just my humble opinion, not as a "consumer," but as a person who wants to make phone calls away from home.

Regards, Tom


No doubt many reg readers will agree that they are not surprised at  this report.

I work in IT, i can happily set up an SMTP server (amongst others) yet when i got my v3 razr set up for email, even i was struck by the complexity of it. Maybe this is due to the nature of the mechanics involved, but given that many a user will be scared of configuring their email client because of such words as Pop and SMTP unless you have an IT dept on hand to sort out your crackberry or other executive toy then its usually a waste of time, not to mention frustrating.

Perhaps had the operators paid any attention to the way of IT in the last 10 years,  they wouldn't force half baked techology on us. I definitely would have preferred the phone-mp3 players to come along before phone-cameras .. i have never used the camera on my phone... again cos it is half baked and my digital camera is better.

Keep up the good work.

Jez


Less entertaining was the news that passports are getting more expensive. Again. Because of biometrics, dontcha know:

I think you might have specifically pointed out that the blatant idea behind this is to make the increase which will occur when ID cards are introduced seem significant smaller...

Donald


Oh, only 30% increase? In Switzerland, prices went from 50 Swiss Francs (~ 115 £) to 250 Swiss Francs (~575 £), while the lifetime has been cut in half from 10 to 5 years. That is an increase of *hold my breath* 800%.

-- Matthias

Keep that to yourself, please, or our lot will nick the idea before you can say "biometric anti-fraud measures".


These charges must therefore be because of the set-up costs of the scheme, yes? That ought to mean, once the costs are recovered, it will go back down in price. And, since there is less fraud and making it electronic reduces cost of working with the process, the price ought to go down from the current system.

If it does not, then that is avidence that the scheme has failed.

Or they are using their amazing talking arse routine....

Mark

We may never know, Mark, but we can always guess...


The fact that the passport office actually feels the need to justify itself in hiking the prices of the passport by comparing to other countries shows it has a guilty conscience. After all, you don't see the post office in its recent adverts comparing with parcel delivery services when it hikes the price of posting letters - __because it knows 36p (or whatever it is) is still a damn good price for getting your letters from end of the country to the other__ - I couldn't get a bus to town for that.

Ironic isn't it, we want freedom, yet the passport office is selling us our rights to it, a service constructed and funded with our taxes already, and to top it off, will actually do the opposite of its intention and restrict us with biometrics. Why not call a spade a spade - its a freedom tax not a pass, they should call it a taxport.

Benjamin


Science. But only briefly, because this one gave us a headache the first time we read it. Light goes fast, in reverse:

First meta materials, then backwards flowing light, then trilithium crystals... somebody register 'UnitedFederationOfPlanets.org' already.

This looks like we're on the verge of taking our understanding of the physical world to a new level. The things it will enable us to create will make magic look paltry by comparison.

If we worked harder towards furthering our understanding of how the world really works, we'd be traveling among the stars by now. Instead we play wars, it's like someone has run out of ideas and keeps rehashing an old yarn.

We really need to shape up and put our mental maturity on the same level as our technological ability. Or else the aliens we're certain to meet are going to say : 'Dude, no way these monkeys built a warp drive. They just stole a ship somewhere'.

Jorge


And upon the discovery of a continent on Titan, in the Xanadu region, we asked you to refrain from ONJ references. You did, and we thank you.

Several of you mentioned Rush instead, but we'll pretend we didn't see those, and go straight to this:

Xanadu? I think based on that alone, every geological feature on Titan should be named with references to Citizen Kane. Rosebud Valley, Mount Inquirer, etc.. Then maybe when future generations are sucking the methane off the otherwise barren moon, they can say things like "Hey Jim! Get the ship ready over there by Kane Ridge." and we can snicker from the grave.

Shaun


And finally, a complaint. You know how much we like these. This time, we have been accused of putting overly exciting headlines on straightforward news stories. [They do know this is The Register, right? - Ed]:

Ok, so this is something of a trend I've noticed and it's actually becoming kind of annoying. Ever notice how whenever Microsoft announces some product, way before it's ever to market, all of the sudden it's a competition-killer.

Case in point, the latest article on the Reg for the Zune product. We don't even know what the bloody thing looks like, and yet the headline reads "Microsoft's iPod Killer". Also, when Sparkle was announced, and if you want to go back further to LiquidMotion they were both touted as being Flash killers. Interesting to note LiquidMotion never even made it to market.

While I understand calling something a 'killer is arguably better news and a catchier title... let's just stick to saying what it really is, a competing product.

ndcollins

Because "MS releases music playing product that will compete with Apple's iPod" has such a ring to it?

More on Friday. ®