Original URL: https://www.theregister.com/2000/09/21/wwwhere_theres_a_wonk_theres/

WWWhere there's a wonk there's a way

You tell us what you think about our new WWW terminology

By Kieren McCarthy

Posted in Legal, 21st September 2000 15:37 GMT

We ran a story yesterday we which hoped would solve the irritating need to repeat "double-u, double-u, double-u dot" every time you are talking about a Web site. Instead, we went for the word "wonk" and made the foolish mistake of asking you what you thought.

Well, about 300 emails later, it's an even split. Some loved it, some hated it and most gave alternatives. (There's no pleasing some people.) Anyways, we thought we'd post some of the suggestions that others (and other cultures) have come with to save this tongue-tying tautology.

What's wrong with "wonk"?
Sounds too much like "wank" (Eugene); rhymes with "donk" (George Girton); too close to "wonky" (meaning flakey or of sub-standard quality - John Kratochvil). Is just rubbish (many).

So what instead?



Or, simply, just don't bother with the "www." at all, only making a point when it isn't on the Web (many, many folk).

And there you have it. ®

Related Story

We solve one of the Net's biggest hassles