Feeds

Apple 'fesses up: Rejected from the App Store, dev? THIS is why

How do we hate thee? Let us count the ways

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

Apple has finally confessed to the reasons why developers' iOS apps are failing to appear in its vaunted App Store.

On a new site, Common App Rejections here, Apple has begun listing on a week-by-week basis the reasons behind the rejections being issued from Cupertino.

It has also provided a list of tips and advice that developers can follow to avoid tripping up next time.

According to the iPad and iPhone maker, just 10 reasons account for more than half – 58 per cent – of rejections.

Top of the list, at 14 per cent, is the simple fact that the submitted app lacks an adequate amount of information.

The second biggest reason was buggy apps – eight per cent.

Equal third, on six per cent, were apps where the authors hadn’t complied with Apple’s Developer Program License Agreement and those who’d fallen at the interface design hurdle.

Five per cent, meanwhile, stumbled by including irrelevant names, descriptions or screenshots in their application submissions.

Cupertino wrote:

Apple and our customers place a high value on simple, refined, creative, well thought-through interfaces. They take more work but are worth it. Apple sets a high bar. If your user interface is complex or less than very good, it may be rejected.

Rounding out the top five were the five per cent of apps that contained "false, fraudulent or misleading representations" or use of names or icons that were similar to those of other apps.

Apple has never been forthcoming about reasons why it cans App Store apps, but the new site, which is updated weekly, seems like an attempt by Apple to offer more guidance on the subject.

The App Store features 1.2 million apps, according to Apple, and the company is considered stringent in its vetting and approval process.

The move comes amid ongoing concerns about the presence of poorly written apps in vendors' app stores coupled with a desire by app store owners to continue their store’s growth.

Microsoft last week said it was purging its Windows app store of sham applications that were designed to dupe customers. That company in particular has been on a growth bent, apparently stuffing the numbers to try and catch Apple – it now stands at 100,000 apps.

Microsoft seems to be stepping back in the face of criticism. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Microsoft on the Threshold of a new name for Windows next week
Rebranded OS reportedly set to be flung open by Redmond
'In... 15 feet... you will be HIT BY A TRAIN' Google patents the SPLAT-NAV
Alert system tips oblivious phone junkies to oncoming traffic
Apple: SO sorry for the iOS 8.0.1 UPDATE BUNGLE HORROR
Apple kills 'upgrade'. Hey, Microsoft. You sure you want to be like these guys?
SMASH the Bash bug! Apple and Red Hat scramble for patch batches
'Applying multiple security updates is extremely difficult'
ARM gives Internet of Things a piece of its mind – the Cortex-M7
32-bit core packs some DSP for VIP IoT CPU LOL
Lotus Notes inventor Ozzie invents app to talk to people on your phone
Imagine that. Startup floats with voice collab app for Win iPhone
'Google is NOT the gatekeeper to the web, as some claim'
Plus: 'Pretty sure iOS 8.0.2 will just turn the iPhone into a fax machine'
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.