Feeds

Chumps stump up $1 MEELLLION for watch that doesn't exist

By the way, I have a really nice bridge you might like...

Business security measures using SSL

An Indiegogo project to build a watch that projects its display onto your hand has blown the doors off its target by raising a million dollars in funding – even though no functional device has yet been built.

The Ritot watch uses a DLP matrix in a wristband to project an image on to the back of the wearer's hand. In addition to the time, the watch can show caller ID, texts, Facebook statuses and tweets.

It’s a compelling device. Having raised 2,482 per cent of its target funding of $50,000, the company has added multiple colours of bracelets and a fitness tracker. However, it eventually gave up trying to work out what to do with the extra money and asked for contributor suggestions.

Unfortunately, there is a problem. It’s hinted at in the Indiegogo pitch, where – in between saying that by funding the project you are to become a piece of history, a compelling video and the projected February 2015 shipping date – there is a rather troubling line: “Currently we don’t have a fully working prototype, the photos in campaign [sic] are computer renderings of what we envision the device to look like.”

I predict a Ritot

Hands up who wants their money back?

It’s telling that Kickstarter would not have accepted a project at this stage. Indiegogo is more liberal. The renderings show the time displayed with the wearer's hand at all kinds of different angles, yet in the description of the components there is nothing on the optics which might track the position of the hand it’s projecting the display onto.

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the contributors' comments section has descended into a set of uncouth squabbles among some of the 6,910 people who put money into the endeavour. The technology has also been comprehensively debunked by the Dropkicker website.

If you want to fund something that has a much higher likelihood of getting off the ground you’d do much better to visit the Kickstarter page for Project LOHAN. Who knows, with $1.2m we might even put Lester himself into space. ®

Ritot pitch video. Nice production, shame about the lack of working prototype.

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Oi, Tim Cook. Apple Watch. I DARE you to tell me, IN PERSON, that it's secure
State attorney demands Apple CEO bows the knee to him
4K-ing excellent TV is on its way ... in its own sweet time, natch
For decades Hollywood actually binned its 4K files. Doh!
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
DARPA-backed jetpack prototype built to make soldiers run faster
4 Minute Mile project hatched to speed up tired troops
Hey, Mac fanbois. HGST wants you drooling over its HUGE desktop RACK
What vast digital media repository could possibly need 64 TERABYTES?
Monitors monitor's monitoring finds touch screens have 0.4% market share
Not four. Point four. Count yer booty again, Microsoft
Apple's Watch is basically electric perfume
It isn't just me-too Apple that's lost its lustre: Gadget mania is over
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.