Feeds

TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit

Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Google will pocket a tidy $1.3m in fees after prevailing in a case against a patent holding firm that turned on its customers.

A US District Court has ruled that Beneficial Innovations will have to cover the Chocolate Factory's legal costs after the company lost a jury case earlier this year.

Google successfully argued that Beneficial Innovations acted in violation of a licensing deal it had signed with Google in 2010 when it attempted to sue several Google customers alleging infringement of its patents.

According to Google, the patent deal it had agreed to would shield customers from litigation, and by filing the suits against customers of Google's DoubleClick service, Beneficial was violating the deal.

Back in January, a jury found Beneficial to be in violation of its contract with Google by breaking the clause shielding litigation. The Chocolate Factory did not exactly cash out in that deal, as the awarded damages were calculated at all of one dollar. Google did, however, as part of the decision win the dismissal of Beneficial's suits against its customers.

Still, the company sought to extract a pound of flesh from Beneficial by at least sticking the firm with a seven figure legal bill as well as more than a hundred thousand dollars in fees for expert consultants it brought in for the case.

Despite arguments from Beneficial, the court decided that by prevailing in the case Google was entitled, under the terms of its contract with Beneficial, to recover its fees. An appeal from Beneficial was turned down earlier this month.

The judge partially upheld that claim, awarding Google the $1.3m payment for legal bills but denying the $101,324.50 Google spent on its expert witness testimony.

The case is now considered to be closed.

While the $1.3m is hardly considered a windfall for Google, who make more than that in the time it takes Larry Page to sneeze and wipe his nose, the decision will be welcomed by advocates of patent reform who have been critical of so-called patent troll firms for bringing vague and frivolous infringement claims against businesses in order to get a payout. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
BIG FAT Lies: Porky Pies about obesity
What really shortens lives? Reading this sort of crap in the papers
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.