Feeds

YES YES YES! Apple patents mousy, pressure-sensing iVibrator

Fanbois prepare to experience the great Cupertin-O

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Apple has been granted a patent for a vibrating mouse which will respond to fanbois' hamfisted affections using advanced pressure sensing technology.

Sadly, the "Force Sensing Mouse" will not turn Appleytes into Jedi knights, but it may allow them to navigate their computers into hitherto unfamiliar ways.

Currently, the Apple Magic Mouse allows users to employ the sort of two or three finger gestures familiar to MacBook owners. If it ends up in a product, the new patent will entirely strip away the potential for offence inherent in these gestures, instead allowing users the chance to simply push down on the device to perform certain functions.

Most mice already sense pressure. But Apple’s proposed super sensitive mouse design appears to offer more sophisticated interaction than a single or double click. It allows users to press down on any part of the device and then detects how much pressure they are applying by responding to haptic vibrations.

Apple's latest patent connects the top surface of the mouse to a cantilever beam, which can "train, twist, flex, and/or otherwise alter its configuration". The cantilever is attached to a strain gauge, which outputs a voltage as it "deforms".

The surface of the mouse could even be multi-touch, which means that it could detect which spot on the device is being pressured and then send a different signal. Pressure can also be detected on each side of the mouse and a solenoid is used to provide "haptic feedback", vibrating the device when pressure is applied or following instructions received from a computer.

In its patent, Apple said this could be useful for controlling video games.

"The amount of force may correspond to a height that a character in a video game is instructed to jump," wrote the device's inventors James Wright and Keith Hendren.

It could also be used in flight sims, with different pressure on various parts of the mouse used to steer the virtual plane, or simply to interact with computer programs. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Xperia Z3: Crikey, Sony – ANOTHER flagship phondleslab?
The Fourth Amendment... and it IS better
Don't wait for that big iPad, order a NEXUS 9 instead, industry little bird says
Google said to debut next big slab, Android L ahead of Apple event
Microsoft to enter the STRUGGLE of the HUMAN WRIST
It's not just a thumb war, it's total digit war
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
A drone of one's own: Reg buyers' guide for UAV fanciers
Hardware: Check. Software: Huh? Licence: Licence...?
The Apple launch AS IT HAPPENED: Totally SERIOUS coverage, not for haters
Fandroids, Windows Phone fringe-oids – you wouldn't understand
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.