Feeds

2,285,295 Aussie logins nabbed in Russian password haul

Thousands of .au sites p0wned and thrown to the winds

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More than two million unique login credentials for Australian internet users were stolen as part of the massive haul of 1.2 billion passwords by a Russian hacker outfit.

Earlier this month Hold Security reported that Russian hackers under the group dubbed CyberVors amassed the largest ever cache of stolen website passwords through automated and botnet-driven SQL injection attacks against horribly insecure websites.

The hackers reportedly amassed a staggering 4.5 billion username and password combinations including many duplicates, or 1.2 billion unique pairs.

Of these, 2,285,295 compromised accounts related to email addresses ending in '.com.au' and included corresponding passwords, Alex Hold told The Register.

At least 5929 Australian '.com.au' websites were found in the hacker haul which were either exploited or vulnerable to exploitation via SQL injection.

Those numbers could be higher if other suffixes such as '.net.au' were included. This would catch mail accounts from Australia's two biggest internet providers BigPond and iiNet, among others.

The figures could grow further still since other popular email accounts such as Google's Gmail and Microsoft's Hotmail (one of this reporter's less-significant passwords was nabbed in the breach) did not indicate the location of users by top level domains, and notoriously insecure government websites were omitted.

Hold declined to name or provide further descriptions of the hacked websites, such as country of origin or verticals, which ranged from small businesses to large household name organisations. He was contacting some of the affected website owners to alert them of the compromise.

The intelligence bod has, like others in his field, established tendrils throughout private cybercrime websites to monitor for breaches and exploits.

He most famously revealed the huge Adobe breach in October last year that affected some 38 million users.

Hold came under fire for launching a $120 a month breach-notification service the same day news of the Russian hack broke. In a post Hold said the service was not pitched at individual users but to organisations wanting to protect their sites. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
FYI: OS X Yosemite's Spotlight tells Apple EVERYTHING you're looking for
It's on by default – didn't you read the small print?
Russian hackers exploit 'Sandworm' bug 'to spy on NATO, EU PCs'
Fix imminent from Microsoft for Vista, Server 2008, other stuff
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Microsoft pulls another dodgy patch
Redmond makes a hash of hashing add-on
'LulzSec leader Aush0k' found to be naughty boy not worthy of jail
15 months home detention leaves egg on feds' faces as they grab for more power
China is ALREADY spying on Apple iCloud users, claims watchdog
Attack harvests users' info at iPhone 6 launch
Carders punch holes through Staples
Investigation launched into East Coast stores
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.