US judge 'troubled' by Apple's $450m bid to end ebook price-fixing row

Beak questions whether settlement is fair to customers

Security for virtualized datacentres

US federal judge Denise Cote is not particularly chuffed with Apple and its proposed $450m settlement in an ebook price-fixing lawsuit – because the odds are stacked against customers if the appeals process goes Cupertino's way.

Apple and 33 American states and territories came to the deal on how much the company should pay after Cote found it liable for antitrust violations in a separate trial. The parties were due to have another trial on the amount of damages before they agreed on the settlement.

The deal gives ebook readers a pot of $400m, while legal beaks will get as much as $50m on top of that. But the settlement only goes ahead if the appeals court declines Apple’s arguments.

Judge Cote said yesterday that she found it “most troubling” that the settlement included a clause that would require Apple to part with a mere $70m if the appeals court sent the case back to her for further proceedings or a new trial.

She wondered if it was fair for customers if the appeals court only returned the case to her because of a minor issue. She also questioned the lack of requirement for Apple to pay interest while the appeals go ahead, Reuters reports.

Cote found Apple liable for conspiring with the five major publishers to fix the price of ebooks in July last year, after cases brought by the US Department of Justice and the state attorneys-general. Hachette, HarperCollins, Penguin, Simon & Schuster and Macmillan all settled at various points in the suits and have paid up, but Apple is still fighting on in the appeals court.

The damages trial was originally expected to end up with as much as $840m in the pockets of plaintiffs, if their arguments succeeded and Judge Cote went for triple damages.

Steve Berman, a lawyer for consumers, told Judge Cote that they reckoned that the scenario where customers only got $70m was unlikely, but he said that the parties would consider her concerns. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
DVLA website GOES TITSUP on day paper car tax discs retire
Welcome to GOV.UK - digital by de ... FAULT
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story


Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.