Feeds

Bose says today is F*** With Dre Day: Beats sued in patent battle

Music gear giant seeks some of that sweet, sweet Apple pie

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Audio thing biz Bose is suing Apple-owned Beats Electronics, alleging patent infringement.

Massachusetts-based Bose claimed in its court filing [PDF] that headgear designed by Beats violated five of its patents, all relating to noise-canceling headphones. According to the paperwork dated July 25, Bose reckons the Beats Studio and Studio Wireless headphones specifically violate its protected technologies.

The patents in question are:

  • US 6,717,537 – Method and apparatus for minimizing latency in digital signal processing systems
  • US 8,073,150 – Dynamically configurable ANR signal processing topology
  • US 8,073,151 – Dynamically configurable ANR filter block topology
  • US 8,054,992 – High frequency compensating topology
  • US 8,345,888 – Digital high frequency phase compensation

"To protect its investments, Bose has sought patent protection, and owns many patents and patent applications," Bose attorneys said in the filing, which is seeking damages.

"Because Bose invests heavily in research and development, and because Bose has built its reputation on producing superior products through innovative technology, Bose’s continued success depends in substantial part on its ability to establish, maintain, and protect its proprietary technology through enforcement of its patent rights."

The company is now seeking a jury trial on the matter through a Delaware district court. A judge in the case has yet to be assigned.

Beats did not respond to a request for comment on the matter.

The lawsuit, perhaps not coincidentally, comes after Beats suddenly finds itself flush with cash in the wake of a $3bn acquisition by Apple. Cupertino opened up its checkbook to bring the Beats headphone line – cofounded by rapper Dr Dre, known for hits like Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang and F*** wit Dre Day – into its fold along with the company's streaming music service.

While the infusion of cash could make Beats a lucrative target, a tie-up with Apple also gives the company sizable legal resources. The iFirm itself is no stranger to patent litigation, engaging in a long-running courtroom war of attrition with Samsung and other Android hardware vendors. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.