Feeds

Report: Beijing watchdog reckons chip-slinger Qualcomm has monopoly in China

Still investigating whether it is abusing position

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Beijing’s anti-competition authority, currently midway through a probe of Qualcomm, has reportedly said it believes the chipmaker does have a monopoly in China.

The chip giant has been under investigation by the National Development and Reform Commission for allegedly overcharging and abusing its market position in China, a region that provides a hefty portion of the firm’s sales and patent royalty revenue.

Sources whispered to state-run newspaper The Securities Times today – translated by Google and by Reuters – that the regulator did believe Qualcomm had a monopoly but had not yet determined if the firm was abusing that hold on the market.

Qualcomm is accused of charging lower royalties for its patents in order to undercut competition and keep its tight grip on the market. The paper also said that since the firm was the only provider of chips for high-end mobes, it was dictating licensing fees.

The company did not respond to a request for comment from The Reg and its chief exec, Steven Mollenkopf, who is currently in China, refused to take questions from reporters.

According to The Securities Times report, NDRC is looking into both Qualcomm and its customers and its investigation is “extremely serious”. The paper said that while Qualcomm’s share of patents relating to wireless network tech standards has fallen, its prices haven’t changed.

The Chinese regulator can levy fines of between one and 10 per cent of a company’s revenues in the country for anti-competitive behaviour, which could lead to a record fine of more than a billion dollars for Qualcomm.

Although the firm announced solid results for the third quarter yesterday, the reception was marred by investor concern over the situation in China. Shares dropped 5.15 per cent to $81.60 as shareholders worried whether the chipmaker’s performance can continue if the investigation doesn’t go its way. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.