Feeds

Remember the turbo button on PCs? New AWS instance has one for CPU burst

Yes, we know it slowed old kit - but not in Amazon's case

Boost IT visibility and business value

Amazon Web Services has unveiled a cheaper EC2 instance type that's geared for running small workloads at low cost. Crucially, it can temporarily ramp up compute performance when it's really needed.

The cloud giant reckons its new T2 instances provide affordable options for users running less-demanding applications, such as low-traffic websites, small databases and remote desktops.

The instances allow users to run single or dual CPU virtual machines (VMs) on shared hardware powered by 3.3GHz Xeon processors; these VMs automatically increase performance by redeeming banked "CPU Credits", which grant access to more compute oomph for one-minute bursts.

Amazon said the CPU credit system allows the instances to operate at low performance for hours at a time with the ability to burst into a higher speed for short periods of time when needed. Credits are banked when no burst mode is required, and redeemed over a 24-hour period.

The T2 family will have three instance options: a "micro" option with a single vCPU, 1GB of RAM and six CPU credits accrued per hour at a cost of $9.50 per month ($0.013 per hour); a "small" instance with 2GB RAM and 12 hourly credits at $19 monthly; and a "medium" configuration with two vCPUs, 4GB RAM and 24 credits at a cost of $38 monthly.

"Many interesting compute workloads follow a similar pattern, with modest demands for continuous compute power and occasional needs for a lot more," wrote AWS evangelist Jeff Barr.

"Many of these workloads are cost-sensitive as well. Organizations often deploy hundreds or thousands of remote desktops and build environments at a time; saving some money on each deployment can have a significant difference in the overall cost."

The new line will compete with the low-end offerings from AWS rivals such as Google Cloud's shared core compute engine instances and Microsoft Azure's low-cost instances.

The cloud giants have found themselves in a price war as of late, with instance and storage costs being cut. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Docker kicks KVM's butt in IBM tests
Big Blue finds containers are speedy, but may not have much room to improve
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Gartner's Special Report: Should you believe the hype?
Enough hot air to carry a balloon to the Moon
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Dell The Man shrieks: 'We've got a Bitcoin order, we've got a Bitcoin order'
$50k of PowerEdge servers? That'll be 85 coins in digi-dosh
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.