Feeds

MongoDB pops up in Microsoft and Google data centers

Oracle's NoSQL nightmare inks new pacts, gets into all major clouds

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Security for virtualized datacentres

Those expert dealmakers at MongoDB have done it again and have announced freshly-inked agreements that will loft the company's NoSQL database into Google and Microsoft's cloudy data centers.

The company announced on Tuesday that it had sealed pacts with the two companies to make it easier for developers to launch MongoDB databases on top of their respective clouds.

With these new relationships the company has gained a foothold in all three of the major clouds. (It already had a relationship with Amazon that made it available on the company's eponymous marketplace. – Ed)

By partnering with the big companies, MongoDB has cut the steps it takes for developers to get the database humming in public clouds, with MongoDB now available as an Add-On in the Microsoft Azure Store, and also via a preview "Click to Deploy" button on Google.

"Fundamentally we want developers to be able to bring up a Mongo cluster on any infrastructure they want very easily," explained MongoDB's CTO, Eliot Horowitz, in a chat with El Reg. "Technically, people have been running DBs on their cloud infrastructure for a while so it was just a matter of the integration."

As any entrepreneur knows, if you aren't sticking your product in front of punters it's hard to sell it, so MongoDB's deals are a big factor in its broad developer adoption.

These agreements follow a spate of activity in the past few months that has seen the company join Pivotal's "Cloud Foundry Foundation" to help tie its system closer to the company's eponymous platform-as-a-service, link its sales and marketing and technology organizations with Hadoop-expert Cloudera, and team up with IBM to make it easier for MongoDB apps to work with data kept in DB2 and WebSphere - and vice versa.

With the new Google and Microsoft agreements, the company appears just as keen to make its database prevalent in the cloud as it is to be ubiquitous in on-premises tech.

Though MongoDB isn't yet in the same league as the database incumbents it's trying to displace, it's doing a better job of getting its name out there than its young rivals DataStax, Couchbase and EnterpriseDB. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.