Feeds

Warrantless snooping on American man was LEGAL in terrorism case, rules US judge

Gov use of FISA data passes muster in Oregon district court

The smart choice: opportunity from uncertainty

A US judge has ruled that warrantless electronic surveillance is legal when he upheld the terrorism conviction of an Oregon man.

Mohamed Osman Mohamud, who was convicted of attempting to blow up a van he thought was full of explosives at a Christmas tree-lighting ceremony in Portland, tried to get the ruling overturned because the evidence used against him had been found by electronic snooping on suspected terrorists overseas under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).

His legal team argued that the government’s bulk data-scraping of non-US citizens, which also hoovers up information on the US citizens that contact them, violated his constitutional rights.

But District Judge Garr King rejected the appeal yesterday and upheld Mohamud's conviction, for which he could face a sentence as long as life in prison.

"I do not find any significant additional intrusion," he wrote in his ruling. "Thus, subsequent querying of (the data), even if US person identifiers are used, is not a separate search and does not make (this surveillance) unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.

“When I balance the intrusion on the individual’s interest in privacy, namely the incidental collection of US persons’ communications, against these special needs when the government targets a non-US person believed to be outside the United States, I conclude the foreign intelligence exception applies and no warrant is required.”

Mohamud, a naturalised US citizen originally from Somalia, exchanged around 150 emails with a now-dead member of Al-Qaeda, Samir Khan, and a Saudi national, Amro Ali-Ali, who is now being held in that country for terrorism offences, according to the government.

He said that he wanted to become “operational”, prompting the FBI to use an undercover agent to set up a sting. The agent pretended to be an associate of Ali-Ali and set Mohamud up to detonate what was actually a fake bomb at an annual tree-lighting ceremony in 2010. ®

Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications

More from The Register

next story
ONE EMAIL costs mining company $300 MEEELION
Environmental activist walks free after hoax sent share price over a cliff
Arrr: Freetard-bothering Digital Economy Act tied up, thrown in the hold
Ministry of Fun confirms: Yes, we're busy doing nothing
Help yourself to anyone's photos FOR FREE, suggests UK.gov
Copyright law reforms will keep m'learned friends busy
Apple smacked with privacy sueball over Location Services
Class action launched on behalf of 100 million iPhone owners
US judge: YES, cops or feds so can slurp an ENTIRE Gmail account
Crooks don't have folders labelled 'drug records', opines NY beak
UK government officially adopts Open Document Format
Microsoft insurgency fails, earns snarky remark from UK digital services head
You! Pirate! Stop pirating, or we shall admonish you politely. Repeatedly, if necessary
And we shall go about telling people you smell. No, not really
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Prevent sensitive data leakage over insecure channels or stolen mobile devices.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications
Learn about the various considerations for defending mobile applications - from the application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.