Feeds

AT&T: 'twas conniving contractors who nicked your info

Company fesses up to data breach in California

Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL

AT&T is warning customers that their personal information might have been breached as part of a scheme to unlock and resell devices.

The company said in a filing to the California Attorney General's office that employees at an unnamed service provider it works with had accessed the personal data of customers including social security numbers and date of birth.

According to a letter the company has sent to customers, the breach occurred earlier this year between April 9 and 21 as three workers pulled the customer data in order to request unlock codes from AT&T which could then be used to remove the device from AT&T's network and allow the device to be resold.

The information was apparently part of a scheme by the group to unlock and resell devices on the AT&T network. The company typically allows users to unlock their devices from its network by entering a code which can be obtained from the company by supplying account information including portions of the customer's social security number.

California law requires companies to issue a public disclosure any time they suffer a breach affecting more than 500 residents, though the company has not said exactly how many people were affected in this incident.

AT&T said that it has snail-mailed letters to the customers whose data was accessed, and is offering to pick up the tab for one year of credit-monitoring services, lest the social security numbers be used to register unauthorized charge accounts.

The company is advising affected users to register for the credit reporting services and change the passcode associated with their accounts.

AT&T's disclosure comes just days after restaurant chain PF Chang's said that it had fallen victim to a breach of employee card data. The company, fearing a breach of its payment system similar to the Target hack, has decided to temporarily revert to the use of carbon paper imprinting for all customer card payments. ®

The next step in data security

More from The Register

next story
Israeli spies rebel over mass-snooping on innocent Palestinians
'Disciplinary treatment will be sharp and clear' vow spy-chiefs
Infosec geniuses hack a Canon PRINTER and install DOOM
Internet of Stuff securo-cockups strike yet again
THREE QUARTERS of Android mobes open to web page spy bug
Metasploit module gobbles KitKat SOP slop
'Speargun' program is fantasy, says cable operator
We just might notice if you cut our cables
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
YouTube, Amazon and Yahoo! caught in malvertising mess
Cisco says 'Kyle and Stan' attack is spreading through compromised ad networks
Hackers pop Brazil newspaper to root home routers
Step One: try default passwords. Step Two: Repeat Step One until success
Greater dev access to iOS 8 will put us AT RISK from HACKERS
Knocking holes in Apple's walled garden could backfire, says securo-chap
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.