Feeds

It's tough at the top: Yet another hybrid startup knocks EMC

First Nutanix, now Nimble Storage

Boost IT visibility and business value

Nimble Storage is setting its sights on would-be EMC clients with competitive data tables showing that its product is better than both VNX hybrid arrays and also XtremIO all-flash arrays.

This comes just days after Nutanix opened up its Nix vBlock marketing campaign against EMC-using Vblocks from VCE. It’s hard being top of the storage heap.

The hybrid array startups are on a roll, growing fast and winning lots of deals because of superior price/performance using flash-accelerated data access and disk capacity, adequate data management services, and easier/better system management facilities - at least this is what they claim.

Full of confidence with its latest CS700 news, Nimble Storage has eagerly positioned its kit against a VNX 7600 array and an XtremIO 4 x X-Brick cluster configuration.

This information came from a Nimble-Hosted call for investment analysts following the CS700 launch, and Stifel Nicolaus MD Aaron Rakers reported on the call.

Nimble's CS700 is more flash-enhanced than the VNX 7600 and has, Nimble says, using publicly available EMC information, both lower data access latency and can carry out more IO operations per sec.

Nimble_vs_VNX_and_XtremIO

Click chart to enlarge

A four-node CS700 cluster is compared to a 4 x X-Brick cluster and, Nimble says, its kit has more flash, and better data protection from its RAID and included software. There's no performance comparison though and potential customers would be well advised to carry out a thorough comparison.

It used to be that you could buy an all-flash array by checking out all-flash arrays. Now the hybrid upstarts are making life more complicated by shouting out that they need to be checked out as well because they have as much if not more flash and can have disk capacity economics added in as well their one flash+disk silo doing the job of two separate flash and disk storage silos.

The answer to that by the all-flash array folks would seem to be demonstrating superior speed and having great backend links to disk arrays. Maybe we'll see an XtremIO front-end to a VNX array with FAST tiering software between the two. Now that would be a convergence step to conjure with. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
The Return of BSOD: Does ANYONE trust Microsoft patches?
Sysadmins, you're either fighting fires or seen as incompetents now
Microsoft: Azure isn't ready for biz-critical apps … yet
Microsoft will move its own IT to the cloud to avoid $200m server bill
US regulators OK sale of IBM's x86 server biz to Lenovo
Now all that remains is for gov't offices to ban the boxes
Flash could be CHEAPER than SAS DISK? Come off it, NetApp
Stats analysis reckons we'll hit that point in just three years
Oracle reveals 32-core, 10 BEEELLION-transistor SPARC M7
New chip scales to 1024 cores, 8192 threads 64 TB RAM, at speeds over 3.6GHz
Object storage bods Exablox: RAID is dead, baby. RAID is dead
Bring your own disks to its object appliances
Nimble's latest mutants GORGE themselves on unlucky forerunners
Crossing Sandy Bridges without stopping for breath
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.