Feeds

Vendor mouthpieces promise to stop spamming Wikipedia

Astroturf rolled up and stacked out the back

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Eleven global-scale flackhauses have twigged to the idea that polishing their clients' turds on Wikipedia is a high-risk strategy, and have solemnly pledged not to do so.

Last year, Wikipedia bit the bullet and began investigating cases of sockpuppeting – or, as Wikimedia Foundation executive director Sue Gardner put it, “paid advocacy editing” (the PR industry would probably have described it as “a comprehensive multi-channel brand management strategy until it was rumbled).

As Gardner wrote at the time: “paid editing for promotional purposes, or paid advocacy editing as we call it, is extremely problematic. We consider it a “black hat” practice. Paid advocacy editing violates the core principles that have made Wikipedia so valuable for so many people.”

That investigation led to 250 accounts being blocked.

Back in 2011, Wikipedia had suspended accounts associated with Bell Pottinger in the UK, leading the Public Relations Society of America to call for flacks to be allowed to make edits.

That push has now stalled, and the PR industry is moving towards Wikipedia's position.

The 11 PR outfits listed as participants in the Wikipedia “pledge-to-be-nice” include such names as Ogilvy & Mather, FleishmanHillard, Burson-Marsteller, Porter Novelli and Edelman. Branches of the companies listed represent the likes of Samsung, Citrix, Avaya, HP and many other technology concerns, so the pact will impact the way Reg readers are targeted.

They vow to try to understand Wikipedia's “fundamental principles”, to follow guidelines and policies “particularly those related to conflict of interest”, to obey the terms of use (which they did so when they created accounts, but hey), to report conflicts of interest, and to publicise their views and try to get other flacks to play nice as well.

Roughly, since Wikipedia's terms of service forbid such outfits working for pay to edit clients' articles, the signatories will at most be restricted to requesting edits in a page's discussion.

Edelman senior veep Phil Gomes couldn't resist a single snipe at Wikipedia, saying that “there needs to be more from PR than subterfuge and more from Wikipedia than shame”, according to AdAge. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
5 critical considerations for enterprise cloud backup
Key considerations when evaluating cloud backup solutions to ensure adequate protection security and availability of enterprise data.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence
Download Choosing a Cloud Hosting Provider with Confidence to learn more about cloud computing - the new opportunities and new security challenges.