Feeds

Semiconductor boffin: 3D NAND don't need NO STEENKIN' TSVs

Cut out 'n' keeper for your storage primer

Security for virtualized datacentres

Blocks and Files Chip analyst Jim Handy of Objective Analysis took exception to several issues raised in a recent 3D NAND story, and El Reg storage desk asked him a few short questions for clarification.

He provided a few short answers that did just that - and here they are.

El Reg: Are there TSVs (through-silicon vias – vertical electrical connections through a stack of chips) in 3D NAND? And if not, why not?

Jim Handy: There are no TSVs in 3D NAND because there is no need for TSVs. You use TSVs to connect multiple chips, and 3D NAND is single chips.

El Reg: Does 3D NAND use stacks of planar cells?

Jim Handy: 3D NAND uses cells built sideways. These are very different from planar cells. What if you stop calling it "3D" and start calling it "Sideways" NAND (at least to yourself)? That might set your thinking in the right direction.

El Reg: How do the flash cell geometries in planar NAND and 3D NAND compare? How does 3D NAND affect lithographies?

Jim Handy: 3D NAND cells have doughnut-shaped cells and planar cells are flat and square. It's hard to compare the cell "sizes" since they are different things altogether. The process for 3D is not litho-intensive so manufacturers will be using relaxed process technologies like 40-50nm while working to use an aggressive number of layers.

Jim Handy: Samsung has made claims of higher reliability but hasn't released specifications to back that up. One very good reporter I know (you) published an article last August named something like: “Samsung’s cooking 3D NAND flash chips. What Did You Say the Specs Were? Oh right… you didn’t! I have guessed that the use of a charge trap will lower programming energy which should increase endurance, so that's a double benefit: Lower write power and longer life. I'm not positive about that, though."

The analyst seems very keen to get his hands on some, though. "I find it interesting that Samsung's now producing its 2G 3D V-NAND when I have been unable to find anyone outside of the company that has encountered its 1G 3D V-NAND."

Thank you kindly Jim. TSVs are an inter-chip connect and a single chip doesn’t need them. Engrave it on your brain, tattoo it somewhere, or write it on your screen saver. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.