Telefonica, Netronome jump into the NFV mosh-pit

More reference designs, hooray

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Yet more ants are flocking to the Network Function Virtualisation (NFV) picnic, with announcements of tie-ups and reference designs from Telefonica and Netronome.

Telefonica is jumping in with both feet, with a canned announcement of a project with Red Hat and Intel.

That project aims to create “a virtual infrastructure management (VIM) platform based on open source software running on standard Intel-based servers”. The Spanish-headquartered telco's Enrique Algaba, who heads up Telefonica's research arm, told LightReading the company needs NFV “instantly”, perhaps paradoxically since the project has a two-year timespan.

Telefonica's NFV reference lab will use Intel Xeon E5-2600 V2-based servers running Red Hat Linux, the KVM hypervisor, Red Hat's OpenStack implementation, and OpenFlow-based switching kit.

The lab will be opened to partners and equipment suppliers to let them test their NFV and service orchestration technologies. In a separate announcement, Telefonica, Intel and packet-optical SDN/NFV outfit Cyan have said they're working on orchestration software.

Netronome's NFV reference design, shown off at the TM Forum Live 2014 in Nice, France, was developed in conjunction with Service Mesh and PlumGrid.

Its demo, says the company's release, shows off “the use of a cloud orchestrator with OpenStack integration to provision a virtualised network topology while monitoring and enforcing SLAs via SDN-OpenFlow, across [a] legacy MPLS WAN”.

That, Netronome says, shows its SDN stack operating all the way from the multi-tenant data centre out to a carrier IP/MPLS network.

NFV as TL;dr

For those unfamiliar with the term, Network Function Virtualisation refers to identifying operations that currently reside in custom silicon – and proprietary code – inside single-function devices, and handing those functions off to a generic (usually) Intel server outside the switch.

Right now, the customer has a deployment choice between buying One Rack to Rule them All and populating it with all manner of function-specific blades – the switches themselves, a firewall, a router, subscriber management, a RADIUS server, NAT and so on – or buying discrete devices.

The first option means your deployment is tied to your favourite vendor's release cycle, while the second can be a management nightmare. NFV re-imagines the stack: at the bottom are standard high-capacity switches and routers, but other functions are virtualised and deployed to high-capacity generic servers. ®

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

More from The Register

next story
IT crisis looming: 'What if AWS goes pop, runs out of cash?'
Public IaaS... something's gotta give - and it may be AWS
Linux? Bah! Red Hat has its eye on the CLOUD – and it wants to own it
CEO says it will be 'undisputed leader' in enterprise cloud tech
BT claims almost-gigabit connections over COPPER WIRE
Just need to bring the fibre box within 19m ...
Oracle SHELLSHOCKER - data titan lists unpatchables
Database kingpin lists 32 products that can't be patched (yet) as GNU fixes second vuln
Ello? ello? ello?: Facebook challenger in DDoS KNOCKOUT
Gets back up again after half an hour though
Hey, what's a STORAGE company doing working on Internet-of-Cars?
Boo - it's not a terabyte car, it's just predictive maintenance and that
prev story


Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Intelligent flash storage arrays
Tegile Intelligent Storage Arrays with IntelliFlash helps IT boost storage utilization and effciency while delivering unmatched storage savings and performance.
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.