Feeds

Facebook wants MORE EXPLICIT SHARING

ZOMFG, NOBODY CARES what crops you just grew in Farmville …

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Facebook is asking developers who use its platform to indulge in a lot more explicit sharing.

The House of Zuck isn't asking devs to code with their pants off. Instead, The Social NetworkTM wants developers to stop their apps spaffing news of every microscopic event into its users' new feeds.

Explaining the change, Facebooker Peter Yang writes “... we've found that people engage more with stories that are shared explicitly rather than implicitly, and often feel surprised or confused by stories that are shared implicitly or automatically.”

Stories in the latter camp include the kind of Facebook notifications that pop up when friend who happens to play the same game as you ticks off an achievement, or the endless prattle emitted by the likes of Farmville.

Facebook seems to have noticed that this stuff annoys people and is now encouraging developers to do less of it. And if they won't, Facebook just won't bother pumping much of it into users' feeds anyway.

The company seems sincere in these efforts inasmuch as it has even nobbled Instagram, which no longer automatically cross-posts new pics to Facebook. Users must instead actively choose to cross-post to any other online service.

New guidelines for developers look quite stern, pointing out that apps need to request an “explicit” share and outlining many circumstances in which it will be denied.

Facebook users grumble – a lot – about the way the service selects and orders content in their feeds. This update does not seem to impact the feature generating most complaints – pushing old posts to the top of the list for no reason – but will mean a smaller volume of automatically-generated posts. Which may or not be a good thing: stuff that goes on in Farmville is more interesting than many people's lives. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.