Feeds

Oi, ebook price fixer. Yes, you, Apple – stop whinging and get your chequebook out

That's more or less what a US appeals court said today

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

A US appeals court has rejected Apple’s attempt to delay the damages trial over its ebook price-fixing scandal. The iPhone maker had hoped to postpone the hearings until after it’s had a chance to appeal its guilty verdict.

In a very short order, seen by The Register, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in New York denied Apple’s petition. The Cupertino company asked judges to hold off deciding how much it must pay until after it had appealed its conviction – Apple was found guilty of colluding with major publishers to fix the price of ebooks.

The second circuit appeals court said the damages-setting trial on 14 July should go ahead since the iPad maker had failed to “meet the requisite standard” to get it put on hold.

Around 33 state attorneys general and the Department of Justice are looking to get up to $840m (£501m) in damages out of Apple in the July trial, after District Judge Denise Cote found Apple complicit in the conspiracy to raise ebook prices in an attempt to break Amazon’s growing stranglehold on the fledgling market.

The five publishers implicated in the conspiracy – Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster – all opted to settle the case before it got to trial, but Apple has stayed resolute in its claims that it didn’t do anything wrong. The company has fought tooth and nail against every aspect of the case, including the sanctions from Cote that called for renegotiation of contracts between Apple and publishers and, of course, its antitrust monitor (a man loathed by Apple).

It took months of wrangling in the courts to get Apple to accept the court-appointed monitor, who’s supposed to keep an eye on the firm’s competition policies and practices. The company only submitted after an appeals court clearly outlined the monitor’s duties, which Apple had claimed were too broadly defined. ®

Bootnote

An $840m damages payout is equivalent to eight days of annual profit for Apple, judging by its $37bn net income for 2013 – it makes about $1,100 in net income a second.

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.