Feeds

Pure Storage sets out stall: We want to rule the storage world

How exactly can one firm count a whole industry as its rivals?

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Blocks and Files Storage industry lore has it that NetApp has been the only stand-alone storage company after EMC to establish its technology as a storage platform. Now Pure Storage, the energised all-flash array (AFA) startup, says it wants to be the next storage platform company.

NetApp's offering comprises a long-lived storage system with a large number of loyal customers, an eco-system of suppliers and support and training companies associated with it.

All storage startups since NetApp have either been acquired, had an IPO and languished, not had an IPO and languished, or stayed alive inside a smallish – relatively – market niche.

So, this announcement makes great marketing for Pure, but suppose it really means it? What might it have to do to succeed? Here’s the storage Vulture’s little list:

  • Out-develop all other AFA companies in product hardware and software
  • Add scale-out to its current scale-up arrays
  • Upgrade product to using newer, small geometry flash, like 19nm, to build up its SSD capacity
  • Add PCIe interface so it can participate in ServerSAN schemes
  • Add file interfaces
  • Add back-end nearline/bulk capacity array integration or access mechanism (on-premise and cloud)
  • Explore TLC cold storage vault flash technology
  • Grow and extend its software capability for better data management and better virtual server integration (VMware, Hyper-V, KVM, etc.)
  • Be up with the leaders and ideally past them in product support arrangements
  • Continue its extrovert marketing but include marketing against AFA competition and hybrid flash/disk arrays as well as disk-based SANs and filers

Pure’s great task, if it is to become a platform storage company, is to sell and market its product and develop its technology better than its competitors, who, in order of might, include: EMC and Solidfire; NetApp and Violin; and IBM, Cisco, Huawei, Skyera and others. Moreover, Pure needs to ensure that rival firm Kaminario doesn’t come down from the performance high ground niche into the broader enterprise market.

Can Pure do it? The biggest problems we see it having to face are the serverSAN idea, compute in the public cloud, and out-developing product versus the enormous ranks of its competition; basically every other storage hardware company. It’s a big, big ask. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.