Feeds

ULA says to BLAME SPACEX for Ruski rocket rebuff

Rockets from Russia pulled? Finger pointed at Musk and Co.

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes

The United Launch Alliance (ULA) says SpaceX is to blame for a looming diplomatic standoff between the US and Russian space programs.

After Russian officials said earlier this week that the nation would only export rocket engines to the US with the guarantee that the parts would not be used for activity "in the interests of the Pentagon," ULA was quick to point a finger at the private space-faring startup.

In a statement provided to El Reg, the firm said:

"ULA and our NPO Energomash supplier in Russia are not aware of any restrictions. However, if recent news reports are accurate, it affirms that SpaceX’s irresponsible actions have created unnecessary distractions, threatened U.S. military satellite operations, and undermined our future relationship with the International Space Station."

SpaceX has yet to get back to us with its thoughts on the ULA claims.

The comments come in the wake of a legal spat between SpaceX and ULA, which carries a contract to provide the launch vehicles for US government "national security" projects. SpaceX challenged that the deal was a monopoly which blocked competitors out of the lucrative government contracting market.

Additionally, the company claimed that by agreeing to purchase a batch of RD-180 rocket engines from Russia's government-backed NPO Energomash, ULA was violating US trade sanctions.

The SpaceX injunction was initially granted, but then overturned by the courts and the proposed deal with NPO Energomash was allowed to continue, though it seems plenty of bad blood remains between the two firms.

Even if The Kremlin says "nyet" to the purchase of the engines, ULA said that it will be able to continue launching Uncle Sam's satellites into orbit.

The company is working on another rocket line (Delta) built entirely from US-sourced parts and says that it currently has a pair of operational vehicles and a two-year supply of engines on hand, should the order for the RD-180 engines be disrupted. ®

A new approach to endpoint data protection

More from The Register

next story
Amazon says Hachette should lower ebook prices, pay authors more
Oh yeah ... and a 30% cut for Amazon to seal the deal
Philip K Dick 'Nazi alternate reality' story to be made into TV series
Amazon Studios, Ridley Scott firm to produce The Man in the High Castle
Nintend-OH NO! Sorry, Mario – your profits are in another castle
Red-hatted mascot, red-colored logo, red-stained finance books
Sonos AXES support for Apple's iOS4 and 5
Want to use your iThing? You can't - it's too old
Joe Average isn't worth $10 a year to Mark Zuckerberg
The Social Network deflates the PC resurgence with mobile-only usage prediction
Feel free to BONK on the TUBE, says Transport for London
Plus: Almost NOBODY uses pay-by-bonk on buses - Visa
Twitch rich as Google flicks $1bn hitch switch, claims snitch
Gameplay streaming biz and search king refuse to deny fresh gobble rumors
Stick a 4K in them: Super high-res TVs are DONE
4,000 pixels is niche now... Don't say we didn't warn you
prev story

Whitepapers

7 Elements of Radically Simple OS Migration
Avoid the typical headaches of OS migration during your next project by learning about 7 elements of radically simple OS migration.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Solving today's distributed Big Data backup challenges
Enable IT efficiency and allow a firm to access and reuse corporate information for competitive advantage, ultimately changing business outcomes.
A new approach to endpoint data protection
What is the best way to ensure comprehensive visibility, management, and control of information on both company-owned and employee-owned devices?