Feeds

The verdict is in: Samsung to pay Apple $120m chump change, but gets tiny rebate

Legal warriors wax fat on both sides

The essential guide to IT transformation

The jury in the latest case of Apple verses Samsung patent infringement has reached a verdict just in time for a balmy California weekend, fining the Korean firm $119.6 million for infringing on two of Cupertino's patents.

"We are grateful to the jury and the court for their service," an Apple spokeswoman told The Register.

"Today's ruling reinforces what courts around the world have already found: that Samsung willfully stole our ideas and copied our products. We are fighting to defend the hard work that goes into beloved products like the iPhone, which our employees devote their lives to designing and delivering for our customers."

After a month-long trial, the eight-person jury found that Samsung had infringed on Apple's "quick links" patent and partially on its "slide to unlock" patent, and cleared the Koreans of two other cases of patent overreach. As a result, whereas Apple wanted wanted $2.2bn in damages, it got just $119.6m instead.

That's better than a poke in the eye with a sharp stick, but it's still not a great deal of money in the greater scheme of things. As of December, Apple has said it had spent over half that in lawyers' fees alone.

Apple will also have to use a fraction of its newly-gained loot to pay Samsung for infringing on its patent for storing and organizing files on a device. The $158,000 award to Samsung is a drop in the ocean, but a reminder that Cupertino is not an innocent when it comes to patent violations.

This is not the end of the process, however – both sides are likely to appeal the verdict, and we'll once more be treated to an identical lawyerly imbroglio.

Kill me now. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
GCHQ protesters stick it to British spooks ... by drinking urine
Activists told NOT to snap pics of staff at the concrete doughnut
Britain's housing crisis: What are we going to do about it?
Rent control: Better than bombs at destroying housing
What do you mean, I have to POST a PHYSICAL CHEQUE to get my gun licence?
Stop bitching about firearms fees - we need computerisation
Top beak: UK privacy law may be reconsidered because of social media
Rise of Twitter etc creates 'enormous challenges'
Redmond resists order to hand over overseas email
Court wanted peek as related to US investigation
Ex US cybersecurity czar guilty in child sex abuse website case
Health and Human Services IT security chief headed online to share vile images
NZ Justice Minister scalped as hacker leaks emails
Grab your popcorn: Subterfuge and slur disrupts election run up
We need less U.S. in our WWW – Euro digital chief Steelie Neelie
EC moves to shift status quo at Internet Governance Forum
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?