Feeds

Ads bandog berates Virgin Media in BSkyB broadband bumf bust-up

Day 47 in the Big Telco House, and Sky's upset at claims about its package

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Virgin Media was successfully muzzled by rival BSkyB today – for failing to adequately explain the basis of a savings claim it made in a direct mail, and for omitting material that showed the differences between competing services.

The UK's ad watchdog upheld two of three complaints submitted by BSkyB in which it moaned about a direct mailing shot posted by Virgin Media to individual households.

In it, the cable company - which is owned by US giant Liberty Global - claimed that customers could save £214.95 if it took out the advertised package with Virgin Media rather than its telco enemy BSkyB.

But BSkyB successfully challenged the offer as being misleading by being fuzzy with the figures.

The broadcaster added that the claim "HD channels included" had "misleadingly implied that Sky customers did not get HD channels included in their TV package." However, the ASA dismissed that particular gripe.

The ad regulator did agree that the flyer failed to provide information showing the differences punted by BSkyB and Virgin Media, which meant the person reading the mailshot was unable to correctly make a comparison of the offers.

Virgin Media claimed it hadn't been ambiguous with its savings claim. The ASA noted that the ISP:

[b]elieved that readers would understand that there were always nuances between the services offered by different providers and would not expect to glean every one of those nuances from a table such as the one shown in the letter.

Finally, they stated that Virgin Media was able to make a comparison against some, all or none of the features available from Sky as long as any comparison being made was fair and accurate.

But the ASA concluded that the £214.95 savings claim was as clear as mud.

"Because we did not consider that the ad clearly communicated that the saving related to Virgin Media’s standard prices, or that consumers would need to purchase a specific TV and phone package to achieve the maximum saving of £214.95, we concluded that the ad was misleading," the watchdog said.

Virgin Media was told to make such savings claims clearer in the future and that the ad must not appear again in its current form. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.