Feeds

El Reg drills into IBM: The storage biz's got that sinking feeling

How long before Blue Big HQ pulls the plug on the whole thing?

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Analysis With the tremendous noise of chickens coming home to roost, IBM's first quarter storage revenues carried on crashing down with depressed revenues.

We covered IBM's overall results here and pointed out that IBM's poor hardware product-based revenues were dragging the overall results down. Within that segment, storage results were quite dire.

Revenues from IBM's Systems and Technology unit (STG) were $2.39bn for the quarter, down 23 per cent compared to Q1 2013.

The chart shows that this is the steepest Q1 decline for some years;

IBM_Storage_HW_revs_Q1fy2014

Analyst outfit Stifel Nicolaus' MD, Aaron Rakers, pointed out: "IBM’s storage results have posted yr/yr declines for the past ten consecutive quarters."

In a series of prepared remarks Martin Schroeter, IBM’s senior veep and CFO, Finance and Enterprise Transformation, said: "Looking at hardware, as expected, the combination of secular and cyclical challenges continued."

Secular changes are the long-term ones, while cyclical changes refer to quarter-to-quarter differences.

Then he said: "Our flash solutions contributed growth again this quarter, however we saw substantial weakness in high-end storage."

That means the DS8000, primarily; IBM's monolithic array that competes with EMC's VMAX and Hitachi/HDS' VSP (which is OEM'd for Hitachi by HP as the XP).

Rakers had this to say about the flash revenues: "Gartner estimates a $46.7m revenue contribution from FlashSystem during the December quarter, up from $37.1m in the prior quarter. This compares to EMC’s XtremIO at $49.5m (albeit including beta customer revenue recognition), and NetApp’s EF540 at $14.6m in the December quarter."

That flash revenue is a very small part of STG's storage revenues.

IBM has previously committed to spending a billion dollars to boost its flash business.

Schroeter continued: "We are selling our industry standard server business to Lenovo. We are repositioning Power and building an ecosystem around OpenPOWER, and we’ve taken actions across Power and Storage to right-size the business to the market dynamics ... we took actions to align our structure to the demand profile we see."

So Big Blue is right-sizing its storage business, meaning possible or probable headcount reductions and product line shrinkage.

There's no prospect, in IBM's implied view, of growth in any of its storage product categories in the short term, sufficient to get storage revenues overall growing.

It's not just cuts in storage, though. Schroeter said: "Our focus for STG in 2014 is to stabilise the profit base. The repositioning of the Power platform, the announcement of POWER8, new announcements in storage, and the right-sizing of the business will all contribute, as we move through the rest of the year. This, together with the divestiture of System x, will result in a smaller and more profitable hardware business going forward."

There are going to be "new announcements in storage ... through the rest of the year."

He emphasised that "IBM will remain a leader in high-performance and high-end systems, in storage and in cognitive computing."

This, we think, with reference to storage, is dubious. We wouldn't really class IBM as a leader in storage, not with its history of declining revenues.

IBM's results announcement had an unintended comical aspect in one sentence: "Revenues from the company’s growth markets decreased 11 per cent." Um, did you mean to say growth market, as in singular?

Tivoli, IBM's systems and network management framework software, was a brighter spot, with Schroeter saying: "Tivoli grew revenue 7 percent. This quarter we had growth in all three of Tivoli’s product segments, systems management, storage, and security. Security grew double digits for the sixth consecutive quarter."

The 451 group's Simon Robinson tweeted:

Of course, “rationalise” means “sell it off”, like the x86 server business.

IBM"s storage business used to be a billion-dollar-a-quarter business. Now it's half that. How low does it have to go before IBM CEO Ginni Rometty decides enough is enough and there's no realistic prospect of salvation? ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
'Urika': Cray unveils new 1,500-core big data crunching monster
6TB of DRAM, 38TB of SSD flash and 120TB of disk storage
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.