Feeds

AWS bins elastic compute units, adopts virtual CPUs

Customers tired of wrapping their heads around odd computing power metric

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Gartner analyst Kyle Hilgendorf has spotted something very interesting: Amazon Web Services seems to have stopped rating cloud servers based on EC2 compute units (ECUs), its proprietary metric of computing power.

ECUs were an odd metric, as they were based on “... the equivalent CPU capacity of a 1.0-1.2 GHz 2007 Opteron or 2007 Xeon processor … equivalent to an early-2006 1.7 GHz Xeon”. AWS rated EC2 instances according to the number of ECUs they employed.

Hilgendorf's blog post links to this AWS page describing EC2 instances ad offering only vCPUs. But a trip into archive.org's record of the page as it appeared on April 13 shows that AWS used to sell both Virtual CPUS (vCPUs) and ECUs.

AWS has confirmed the change has taken place to The Register.

The EC2 FAQ spells it out. Emphases are AWS' own:

Q: Why don’t I see EC2 Compute Units, or ECUs, any more?

Elastic Compute Units have been replaced with processor information and clock speed.

Q: Why did you replace the ECU measurements?

We replaced the ECU measurements in order to provide a more standardized comparison method between instance types. We try to provide measurements that are easy to understand, and more universal.

Hilgendorf writes that the ECU “was always a gnarly concept to grasp".

The Reg understands that AWS customers shared very similar sentiments on a regular basis. Rather than try to educate customers about its odd metric, AWS has simply decided to adopt the far-more-easily-understood and widely-adopted vCPU moniker.

As it transpires, the cloudy colossus foreshadowed it might one day move away from ECUs. In this FAQ it says “Over time, we may add or substitute measures that go into the definition of an EC2 Compute Unit, if we find metrics that will give you a clearer picture of compute capacity.”

vCPUs are clearly that “clearer” description, and as of now they're AWS' standard way for describing the engines in its rent-a-servers.

®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
'Urika': Cray unveils new 1,500-core big data crunching monster
6TB of DRAM, 38TB of SSD flash and 120TB of disk storage
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.