Feeds

How Brit computer maker beat IBM's S/360 - and Soviet spies

'We are the biggest', crafty biz told Iron Curtain prospects

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

IBM announced the System 360 in 1964 and started selling its family of modern mainframes 12 months later. But how do you outsell a problem like IBM?

The S/360 cost IBM $5bn to develop, overshooting its estimated budget in 1962 by more than $4bn. Yet IBM need not have worried.

Such was rate of sales for the S/360 family that between 1966 and 1970 IBM’s annual revenue nearly doubled to $7bn, thereby recouping the S/360’s costs.

By 1970, IBM had 70 per cent of the mainframe market.

The technology is one thing, but can't sell itself. What was the business and sales argument IBM used on customers to buy rather than go with the competition?

“IBM had a simple argument: ‘We are by far the biggest. It’s a safe decision to come to us’,” says Ralph Land from one of IBM’s competitors and who reckons his company possessed machines actually more powerful than the S/360.

“Where ever we were, we faced that and there was no way you could beat it.”

Land sold the LEO III and 4, the KDF8 and KDF9. The LEOs were descendants of first Lyons Electronic Office, based on the Electronic Delay Storage Automatic Calculator (EDSAC) from Sir Maurice Wilkes. It came from LEO Computers, a spin out from J. Lyons & Company.

The KDF9 and KDF9 followed LEO Computers' merger with English Electric to form English Electric LEO and later English Electric Leo Marconi.

Land was export manager Eastern for Europe and the USSR, with offices in various countries. He had 120 staff, with 30 living in hotels in the Soviet Union with their families, but was out-gunned by IBM with 250 bodies mustered at its offices, in Vienna, Austria.

According to Land, IBM with the S/360 became something of a self-fulfilling prophecy: the more customers it signed up, the more persuasive its basic argument of siding with the biggest became.

“If you go to a big organisation and say ‘I’ve got super equipment’ but then IBM comes in and says ‘we’ve got five companies using similar equipment,’ it’s that argument that makes a powerful marketing company like IBM even more powerful,” Land told The Reg.

IBM was helped by the growing reputation of the S/360.

The S/360 was a break-through in computers of the day for a number of reasons: its speed and scale performance, ability to run the same app on different size S/360s and relatively low cost – both of purchase to the customer and manufacturer to IBM.

It was so good that the Soviets coveted the S/360 and are reputed to have smuggled 11 IBM mainframes into the USSR via East Germany to try and build their own.

This was the time of the Cold War, and exporting computers to Communist countries was forbidden as the West and the Soviet Bloc countries tiptoed around nuclear war.

The Soviets succeeded in building an S/360 clone – the ES EVM – but, according to Land, they could never get the software to run properly.

Both IBM and English Electric were targeted by the Communists, who tried pilfering trade and technology secrets while they engaged with various ministries, departments, trade bodies and institutions.

Land reckons that he actually did outsell IBM behind the Iron Curtain, and that his business could have been bigger had it not been for IBM’s "buy from the biggest" shtick. He claims to have landed "heavy users" like the planning and the statistics ministries.

"I always argued that if we withheld spares we could bring their economies down and so in a sense they became dependent on us," Land told The Reg.

Just how did he sell against IBM with a product that set the standard for modern computers?

The answer: counter-trade. He capitalised on the Reds' lack of hard currency to pay for new computers by dealing with them creatively.

That meant investments and a kind of bartering. Land set up a counter-trade bureau specifically tasked with running deals. “My attitude was: if we’re going to do counter trade, let’s do it properly,” he said.

English Electric financed a Czechoslovak film, accepted ball bearings from Romania and took hanging baskets from Bulgaria as payment for machines, which the firm swiftly sold on.

Land also proposed technical co-operation. This amounted to limited assembly, within the limits of the western export regulations.

The stuffed shirts at IBM were more reluctant to dirty their starched blue sleeves with such deals.

"Our tactics were whenever possible to try to understand their systems requirements, so that we could configure equipment that met their needs and where possible to help them design the systems," Land said.

"Commercially, we needed to understand that they needed us to help them obtain permission to import the computers by funding the foreign currency to make the purchase and so we agreed to engage in counter trade."

“We helped them do the counter trade in an aggressive and willing way instead of unwillingly,” Land said. “They wanted technology cooperation, so we offered a program that let them assemble our machines but under strict controls.”

Could it have just worked?

We'll never know. English Electric was forced into a marriage by the British government of the time that led to the creation of ICL, as masterminded by then-government minister Tony Benn. All ICL could muster was fourth-largest technology company in Europe, while IBM springboarded off the S/360 to become one of the biggest technology firms and brands in the world. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
The cloud that goes puff: Seagate Central home NAS woes
4TB of home storage is great, until you wake up to a dead device
Azure TITSUP caused by INFINITE LOOP
Fat fingered geo-block kept Aussies in the dark
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
Intel offers ingenious piece of 10TB 3D NAND chippery
The race for next generation flash capacity now on
Want to STUFF Facebook with blatant ADVERTISING? Fine! But you must PAY
Pony up or push off, Zuck tells social marketeers
Oi, Europe! Tell US feds to GTFO of our servers, say Microsoft and pals
By writing a really angry letter about how it's harming our cloud business, ta
SAVE ME, NASA system builder, from my DEAD WORKSTATION
Anal-retentive hardware nerd in paws-on workstation crisis
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
The Heartbleed Bug: how to protect your business with Symantec
What happens when the next Heartbleed (or worse) comes along, and what can you do to weather another chapter in an all-too-familiar string of debilitating attacks?
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.