Feeds

Judge strikes down Apple attempt to bar Samsung's 'untrue' patent comments

Koh allows argument that Cupertino wasn't even using those patents

New hybrid storage solutions

Apple has been rebuffed in its attempt to exclude Samsung testimony in the two firms' ongoing patent infringement case.

Judge Lucy Koh has struck down a request for relief filed by Cupertino's legal eagles in objection to comments made by Samsung relating to Apple's use of patents it has claimed Samsung infringes upon. The Korean electronics giant said in its opening statements that Apple has not put to use patents for which it is seeking damages.

"During opening statements, Samsung's counsel repeatedly made irrelevant, misleading, and even untrue statements that have undoubtedly caused the jury to form impressions that are highly prejudicial to Apple," Cook & Co.'s lawyers wrote in their appeal.

According to Apple, Samsung wrongly asserted that it does not make use of four patents which it says are used in its iOS devices. The patents, according to Apple, relate to the way iOS auto-corrects text, handles missed calls, deploys the Siri virtual assistant, and manages calendar and contact entries.

Apple had asked that Samsung be ordered to not make further statements repeating the claims, and that the jury be given instructions "to curtail the harm and prejudice caused by Samsung's improper statements."

That objection, however, will not be sustained by Judge Koh. In filings posted by FOSS Patents, Koh asks both companies to provide further evidence as to their respective claims on Apple's use of the patents in question, denying the requests for relief in the meantime.

The filings are just the latest in the ongoing patent battles between Samsung and Apple. The two firms have been locked in a long-term legal war over allegations that Samsung's handsets and tablets infringe on Apple's patent holdings.

Last year, Apple won a ruling from the same San José court which brought the company a $924m haul for infringement. The two firms are now battling out a second case regarding additional patent infringement claims. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
Found inside ISIS terror chap's laptop: CELINE DION tunes
REPORT: Stash of terrorist material found in Syria Dell box
Show us your Five-Eyes SECRETS says Privacy International
Refusal to disclose GCHQ canteen menus and prices triggers Euro Human Rights Court action
Drag queens: Oh, don't be so bitchy, Facebook! Let us use our stage names
Handbags at dawn over free content ad network's ID policy
Heavy VPN users are probably pirates, says BBC
And ISPs should nab 'em on our behalf
Italy's High Court orders HP to refund punter for putting Windows on PC
Top beaks slam bundled OS as 'commercial policy of forced distribution'
Former Bitcoin Foundation chair pleads guilty to money-laundering charge
Charlie Shrem plea deal could still get him five YEARS in chokey
NORKS ban Wi-Fi and satellite internet at embassies
Crackdown on tardy diplomatic sysadmins providing accidental unfiltered internet access
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.