Feeds

Judge strikes down Apple attempt to bar Samsung's 'untrue' patent comments

Koh allows argument that Cupertino wasn't even using those patents

Security for virtualized datacentres

Apple has been rebuffed in its attempt to exclude Samsung testimony in the two firms' ongoing patent infringement case.

Judge Lucy Koh has struck down a request for relief filed by Cupertino's legal eagles in objection to comments made by Samsung relating to Apple's use of patents it has claimed Samsung infringes upon. The Korean electronics giant said in its opening statements that Apple has not put to use patents for which it is seeking damages.

"During opening statements, Samsung's counsel repeatedly made irrelevant, misleading, and even untrue statements that have undoubtedly caused the jury to form impressions that are highly prejudicial to Apple," Cook & Co.'s lawyers wrote in their appeal.

According to Apple, Samsung wrongly asserted that it does not make use of four patents which it says are used in its iOS devices. The patents, according to Apple, relate to the way iOS auto-corrects text, handles missed calls, deploys the Siri virtual assistant, and manages calendar and contact entries.

Apple had asked that Samsung be ordered to not make further statements repeating the claims, and that the jury be given instructions "to curtail the harm and prejudice caused by Samsung's improper statements."

That objection, however, will not be sustained by Judge Koh. In filings posted by FOSS Patents, Koh asks both companies to provide further evidence as to their respective claims on Apple's use of the patents in question, denying the requests for relief in the meantime.

The filings are just the latest in the ongoing patent battles between Samsung and Apple. The two firms have been locked in a long-term legal war over allegations that Samsung's handsets and tablets infringe on Apple's patent holdings.

Last year, Apple won a ruling from the same San José court which brought the company a $924m haul for infringement. The two firms are now battling out a second case regarding additional patent infringement claims. ®

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Scrapping the Human Rights Act: What about privacy and freedom of expression?
Justice minister's attack to destroy ability to challenge state
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Hey Brit taxpayers. You just spent £4m on Central London ‘innovation playground’
Catapult me a Mojito, I feel an Digital Innovation coming on
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
EU probes Google’s Android omerta again: Talk now, or else
Spill those Android secrets, or we’ll fine you
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.