Feeds

Judge strikes down Apple attempt to bar Samsung's 'untrue' patent comments

Koh allows argument that Cupertino wasn't even using those patents

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Apple has been rebuffed in its attempt to exclude Samsung testimony in the two firms' ongoing patent infringement case.

Judge Lucy Koh has struck down a request for relief filed by Cupertino's legal eagles in objection to comments made by Samsung relating to Apple's use of patents it has claimed Samsung infringes upon. The Korean electronics giant said in its opening statements that Apple has not put to use patents for which it is seeking damages.

"During opening statements, Samsung's counsel repeatedly made irrelevant, misleading, and even untrue statements that have undoubtedly caused the jury to form impressions that are highly prejudicial to Apple," Cook & Co.'s lawyers wrote in their appeal.

According to Apple, Samsung wrongly asserted that it does not make use of four patents which it says are used in its iOS devices. The patents, according to Apple, relate to the way iOS auto-corrects text, handles missed calls, deploys the Siri virtual assistant, and manages calendar and contact entries.

Apple had asked that Samsung be ordered to not make further statements repeating the claims, and that the jury be given instructions "to curtail the harm and prejudice caused by Samsung's improper statements."

That objection, however, will not be sustained by Judge Koh. In filings posted by FOSS Patents, Koh asks both companies to provide further evidence as to their respective claims on Apple's use of the patents in question, denying the requests for relief in the meantime.

The filings are just the latest in the ongoing patent battles between Samsung and Apple. The two firms have been locked in a long-term legal war over allegations that Samsung's handsets and tablets infringe on Apple's patent holdings.

Last year, Apple won a ruling from the same San José court which brought the company a $924m haul for infringement. The two firms are now battling out a second case regarding additional patent infringement claims. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.